ogmzergrush said:
Not quite. See my previous suggestion about learning to read, and learning to understand the viewpoint which you're arguing about.
Right after you read some stuff about how trying to change the topic after being owned is not a viable diversionary tactic.
BTW im reposting every single sentence of my post until you either adress it or stop being an idiot, quotation systems on this board will not be your saviour.
"You say that even though a fetus has its own genetic identity, its own bodily function and uniqueality, it does not constitute human becuase it does not posses "higher mental function" or "acute self awareness."
Discussed already, refuted, and judged to be somewhat irrelevant. Once again, learn to read.
Explain it then:
"Yet neither do people in comas, epeleptics, some of the mentally ill .. and ofcourse people who are sleeping. Thus if somebody killed you tommorow at night in your sleep, you would have no problem with it since you were not "alive" by your definition anyway."
More than a little amusing, given that you somehow see that it's your right to decide on behalf of all that birth is clearly the best option. It's good that you're looking out for the growths, but it's more than a little sad that you can't see past your attachment to this little blob of meat to see that the decision also affects the OMG REAL LIFE of an OMG REAL PERSON. It's nice that you can decide that the rights of one outweigh the rights of the other though.
Yes I dont think a baby should die because its mother considers it an inconvenience, the same way we dont murder people in the real world for reasons like this.
If a woman has a baby thats partly her own doing, she has a duty to care for it from coneption to birth, if shes one of the sorry sluts who couldn't keep her legs closed and ended up pregnant, there would be many families happy to adopt.
The implication, as I believe I've stated, is that the logical line pursued by most pro-choicers over the last twenty pages of this thread, continues to remain unshaken by the emotive and factually devoid opposition, at least in my opinion.
Yes and your opinion differs from both the scientific and moral facts of our little dilemma.
and has not achieved the success which you seem to see. That's fine though,
Too bad the 70's are over and all the stupid hippies are dying off eh? Society is headed down the same path here (eventually) as in the US, a moral backlash, to a minority who percieves itself to be majority, and which believes it can decide on which child dies and which child lives. Just keep living in your little fantasy world while people like me and robbie undo the work of babykilling liberals and feminists.
if you're too fucking stupid to know you're beat, to know that you're arriving at conclusions without a basis, and too stupid to know that you don't even understand the views you're arguing against, so be it, you are indeed the victor!
I understand that you cant keep your opinion straight, and that you always go off topic and never argue a point once I reply to it, insead responding with crap just like that, cmon if its so easy:
"So heres the implication, either stand up for what you say for and accept its entirety and impications, thus you have no problem with killing: the unborn, coma patients, epeleptics, mental patients, people in their sleep or you admit that in society women should have the legal right to murder their babies, thus making you, an extremely sick fuck who believes every little thing popular society shoves down you throat, and makes no better than a jew murdering nazi."
Edit: Just so you know, your continued participation in this thread, if anything, is simply strengthening the case for abortion.
Just so you know, and you do, you're bullshitting
