Search results

fuck off english advanced... EngAdv: 94 Physics: 94 Eco: 96 4u Maths: 96 3u Maths: 99 Talent and Einstein say .90, Matrix says .95. NOT CONVINCED...

well tim large is half.... and to be fair the girl who topped ee1 is like a supreme english gun and hates maths ahahahaha.

we expected at least a state rank, so i guess we'll see tmrw =)

tim large topping 4u was pretty expected, although good on him for greek as well. glad that baulko got two this year, at least we're no weaker than last year's grade. not to mention there are still a ton of people who state ranked for sure.... hopefully we're second at least this year :)

haha 9+?! we're not ruse :P last year there 2, the year before were 5 or 6.... not sure about this year :P

whoever gets 99.95 :rolleyes2:

how many people are in your bio cohort? if 20 is <50%, try and get at least a majority of complainers.

Terry Lee is by far the most challenging of the 3, but I think Patel's non excel 4u book is really good. It has a mix of hard and easy questions to let you grasp the basics and then apply your knowledge. But really, I don't think anyone should be doing the harder questions in textbooks - they...

^

if the people at your school who beat you aren't the biggest guns in the world it should be fairly doable :)

don't think like this - i got 12/15 in my first belonging assessment, then i did well for the rest of the year. had i got 15/15, i would have been 11th instead of 30th. it makes a HUGE difference, so it's good that you did well :) also gaiz first assessments aren't the end of the world - i got...

scored :D

so basically.... shadowdude gunned it.

there is no best textbook - some textbooks do some parts of the syllabus a lot better than others, and vice versa. eg. dixon chapter 10 is a shithole, but riley does it SIGNIFICANTLY better. on the flipside, dixon tends to cover effectiveness/limitations of policy a bit more in depth than...

haha astro's not THAAAAAAAT bad an option topic... although i gotta admit the 7 marker was a bit odd in the hsc.

LOL yeah babbyyyy, all my ranks were accurate except mx1, which went from 9 to 7 / 166. same as you now mj! bahahaha, i don't think we should be, i only beat you in one assessment, but then again you only beat me by one mark in like every other assessment hahaha. me anthony and kevin got pushed...

khorne is right, if you didn't read the question, it specifically said the emf is measured BETWEEN X AND Y. between these two points, there is a buildup of charge, which is effectively a potential difference, which for the purposes of the hsc, is induced emf. hence, as khorne described, the...

and i pose to you the question, how do you know what you don't really need to elaborate on? it's too difficult to guess marking criteria for 6+ markers, and it's definitely safer to write more.

i found the paper quite challenging, especially multiple choice. i don't think i state ranked lol, i didn't like the way i did the paper at all. the questions didn't suit me... short answer was easy though, essays were okay, but you know, i don't feel confident :(

i wrote 3.5 pages of normal sized writing for AC generators (including the lines given, so filled a booklet minus half a page extra). for the astro 7 marker i did 5 pages of normal sized writing. (by normal sized i mean 8+ words per line)