Search results

That's curious, because I remembered the exam as if we covered EVERYTHING in lectures and virtulally nothing from the book...hence why I felt kind of "cheated" after the exam because I had read the book and it hadn't helped me at all (it actually disadvantaged me because I had to remember much...

get on msn! geez how long has it been mate?

probably because I'm goddamn famous?

what form?

yeah i got it....i think there's a command that if you type in the recipient's address as "everyone" or something like that, then your mail gets sent to all students of MQ. And when you reply, the mail sends to all students once again.

But philosophy that hurts the head is ever-so-fun! =)

One way to shortcut in this subject is to NOT read the readings. My theory is that the readings contain way too much information and that the lecture slides are adequate to understand what you need to know. I could be wrong though...but I remember for PHIL137 it was exactly like that -...

Yeah I agree I guess, the history is rather boring. Although some of the history has some ideas behind it. Like I find the whole "maths can explain everything" idea extremely interesting..... But I would love to be able to get onto some of the current issues. I bet, though, that if you went...

I quite like it....the readings are a little long, but lots of the stuff really interests me. However, my major criticism is that the lecturer goes TOO SLOW...I think he should adopt a way faster pace....

I skipped the law lecture haha...

I got 24. What was the average?

fucken stats!

Thinking of possibly transferring form BA - Psych / Law to B Arts in Media & Communcation - Journalism / B Law @ UTS.

I completely forgot about that...lol

Monday 14th - LAW113 Take-Home Exam Wednesday 16th - PHIL137 Assignment, PSY104 Final Exam Thursday 17th - STAT170 Final Exam THEN NO MORE!!! YAY NO MORE UNI!

I did well, actually. I was so freaked that I was going to fuck it, but when I got back the results I was pleasently surprised.

I like Macq law...but what I don't like is doing lots of work.

you could use the abstract to state which aspect you're going to focus on...

they're out? mad

there must be some scaling system, or it simply wouldn't be fair would it? what if some university was ultra-easy to get straight HDs? then you get some clown who got straight HDs in a dodgy uni transferring to aeronautical space engineering or law or something...