Search results

repeat yr 12 if ya really want

btw, worrying about it wont help - let the Board and UAC do their thing, we cant control it so dont be scared!!

faraday's law of mathematical induction: 'The induced electromotive force or EMF in any closed circuit is equal to the time rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit.' 'rate of change' - on the graph they give us magnetic flux vs time the slope of the line is constant (ie...

i rekon q4 and q8 were ambiguous, loved q 5 & 6 though to throw ppl off but yeh i pu 4a, 8a but im not sure if im right there - anyon else?

yeh i know that, my point was with my example how i pu business studies in aligned as 94 and chemistry aligned at 92, u would need a MUCH higher Raw mark in business to get the 94 than in chem to get the 92 (5-8 marks more), so if in reality i was to compare ppl doin different courses with same...

you're right, BUT How do they compare this ' calibre of the students ' - its almost certain that the average mark for, say, MX2 is MUCH LESS THAN the average mark of chemistry (i'm talking RAW marks here in the externals) so according to u, chem should scale better cause obvioiusly the...

just like i rekon id do MUCH better in eNGLISH EXTENSION 1 AND 2 than someone who doe sthos subjects would do in MX1 AND MX2 plus dont take OUR words for it, the Board of Studies and uac BOTH acknowledge physics and chemistry as 'hard' subjects, through the scaling/moderating they give...

exactly, give us a break for finding this easy, cause we got shatted on in 4U, while u guys got an easy ride in 2U, So its fair plus, OBVIOUSLY, ppl undertaking 4U are GENERALLY better at maths (which is y they took it up), so OFCOURSE 4U ppl are gonna find it easier than 3u ppl, its the same...

why did u even do 3U, if u couldnt scrape 40 marks from Q1-5 in those 2 hours, well, yeh u dont deserve an e3 even

Same, and we do 4U, so i rekon terry lee is right

after seein that, yeh, 77-80/84 really pleased with that

QFT

no, it was pretty easy

Re: How did you guys go? how the hell can u say that?? alrite, i unerstand a lot of ppl arent great at maths, but seriously if u cant get10 marks for Q1, 8 for Q2, 7 for Q3, 8 for Q4, 6 for Q5, 5 for Q 6, and 3 for Q7 then u shouldnt be doin 3Unit maths thats 47 marks that should be in...

as i said earlier, my prediction is a cutoff between 57-65, depending on many factors (how hard they mark, how people went, etc...) and yes, 30% of the ppl attempting teh course WILL GET AN E4 and the enxt 30% AN E3 so dont worry, whetehr it was hard or easy, ur just compared to others...

so, danz, u expect ANYONE who passess that test to get a 45-50/50 or a 90-100/100 just think about wat ur saying, plus that means, taking it as a 1 unit subject, say ur right and 48 is a e4 cutoff, ie 48 gets a 45/50, lets say 82 gets 50/50 0 u expect each '1' makr scaled to equal 6 makrs in...

Re: How did you guys go? ppl complaining about circle geo LOL What do u gusy expect?? its obvious there would be 3-5 marks on cricle geo in the exam, and the one they gave all u had to do was use some of the results i meadn, come on guys??? do u expect them to do it for u...

Re: How did you guys go? That was a ROUTINE, PEDESTRIAN 3Unit Examination, and if u dont think so, have u done the past 10 years HSC??? The reason u think it was hard is cause of the pressure - doin tests at home is ALWAYS easier than teh actual HSC But if u compare this years to the past...

itll be AROUND 62 (ie + or - 5 marks)

ami the only person who thought that was a routine 3U etst, i mean i didnt get all of the Q's right, but im fairly sure im in the low 80's/high 70's raw out of 84 the Questions weren't overly difficuilt