Search results

and extension 2 maths!!! + was it me or - 1 MARK FOR PROJECTILE MOTION AND IT WAS IN MC ??? they usually do 4-6 marks on it they put 5 marks woth of MC as calculations, and hardly any for Short answer yeh....is it just me or is BOS taking a very new direction in these maths and sciene...

yeh i put back emf as well, although the Q thre me off as it said 'when the coil starts to spin', cause back emf doesnt start up until after its spinning for a while, but then realised there could be confusion, but wat they were saying is 'when it is spinning, explain why....'

mass defect did take a while, but payed off i did edison - thought it was a pretty dumb Q (see my above post) Bohr and de Broglie FTW!!! - LOVED THAT q, SERIOUSLY, full put in all the mathematics (how de broglie derived bohr's quantisation of angular momentum formula - they love seeing the...

watd u guys put for y the electronbs would not feel the same POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE as the supplied emf for the motor one?

same EXCEPT 15 i put B - thisQ is causing a lot of controversy

QFT

same - its a p-type-- right? thus, the conduction is by holes holes are in teh VALENCE band, and not the OCNDUCTION band as they are the missing electron in the bond thus to conduct, a neighbouring electron moves into its place - that neighbouring electron is ALSO in the valence band...

B

i was the same - started with westinghousel agreeing with Q then reealised - WESTINGHOUSE WASNT A SCIENTIST so i changed, disagreed with Q, state external factors did NOT have a major impact on Scientists using edison, cause despite external influences such as Westinghouse, and the apparent...

my rap up: MC wasnt too bad, made u think, with 1 or 2 dodgy Q's (as per usual in physics), but overall a FAIR SET OF MC Core: now i thought core was 'different' this year, not your straightforwards 'Syllabus' test, with more than a few triky Q's, and a lot of 3+ markers Option...

uh, STOR was in the 'space' topic, dont think it has much to do with quantisation

oh, so planck's hypothesis was that ONLY BB radiatioon was quantised, and itt was like a special feature of BB radiation, whereas einstein showed that quantisation applied to all EM radiation in other scenarios as well (thru photoelectric effect) and thus wasnt just a property of BB radiation -...

hey guys, can someone help me with something thats buggiong me - what was 'the contribution of einstein to quanum theory and its relation to black body radiation'? i can explain how einstein explained the photoelectric effect, but i cant explain how he helped explain BB Radiation - i though...

lol go to the baord's site and check out the top 10 state rankers in agricultrue - 9/10 go to James Ruse, LMAO

basically chill out watch movies and TV shows GEARS OF WAR 2!!! so much xbox 360 to catch up on go out with friends and yes....many sleepless nights of all the Q's i made silly mistakes on and just being nervous about results, esp when it gets to mid december

full 2006 report form UAC - includes how UAC scale and how the Board scales, most useful stuff is in the tables at the end: http://www.uac.edu.au/pubs/pdf/scaling_report_2006-web.pdf

uh, personally i dont think so bud so the difference between a 90 and 109 is...2 marks in the end??? also i rekon ur e4 cutoff is a little low - a high 70's (78/79) is more likely to just squeeze in an e4 (90), if it will make it at all ill take a stab (lol yeh criticise me if ya want)...

guys I OPENED THIS THREAD and i dont want it to get out of hand, as U AND THE MODS can see, i just put a link up to the official story, and made no comment - i just wanted ppl to know that the board has acknowledged wat happened as normal procedure

http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/media-release/2008/mr-2008-10-30.html

same!!! yeh i also got offered an interview for BIT - i wasnt gna put it down but realised its actually a pretty good course, and considering doing it namu, for more info chek out: http://www.handbook.unsw.edu.au/undergraduate/programs/2005/3971.html...