Search results

Re: 2009 timetable? yeh, basically we got ours in the First week of term 2

tell him the truth, im sure he's not gna be realy upset, because the truth in ur situation is U could have done NOTHING more to prepare - sometimes with exams in just 'in the 3 hours, on the day' that matter the most, and it just wasnt there 4 u in those 3 hours so yeh, nothing u coulda done...

96-100 depending on how they mark it

so is 12 A? cause i put A, but it was so unclear..

q12 was WTF???? Worse than teh one in teh CSSA Trial!!! either A ro D, i deduced....

isnt that 3sf?

PS (for u non Physicists), the light released is quantised, hence the 'line' spectra, and not continuous spectrum i wont even go into how electrons exhibit wave-particle duality, or go into Pauli's exclusion principle or hesienberg's uncertainty principle ...lol, good stuff...quantum...

well, if its in the syllabus, it cna be tested, and to be honest, i know many ppl whose teachers dont do the pracs, but they do something about it - look at the notes uploaded here, look on th einteernet, etc im not saying its ur fault u havent done them, im just sayin if u get a Q in the...

although it is unfortunate some teachers dont go thru the pracs, it is all in the syllabus - and if u havent covered it by the time teh HSC comes along, well its nobody's fault but your own in the end

...get a data sheet and do the working now, pretty easy...

it said 'the mass of the carbon ATOM is 12.00', whatever u were taught dude, its well ddocumented in etxtbooks that if it says 'nucleus'-exclude electron, and if it says 'atom' - include atom plus they were kind enuff to give u the answer so how could u go wrong??

ur teachers credibility goes out the door after q4

lol yeh im pretty sure i got that wrong, i changed my asnwer from that to 'the ammeter goes up to 2.50 only' LMAO i cant stop laughing at how stoopid my asnwer was, oh well, it fit pretty well at the time ----> 1 mark and did we have to subtract 2 ohms from our answers (ie inverso fo the...

next year bud

well they cant have strict criteria for such a Q i dont think, cause they never said to specificallye xplain a section i rekon if u mentioned quarks, leptons and bosons PLUS elaborate on 2-3 points about standard model (just about anyhting relevant, cause they never specified) thats 4 marks...

lets calculate: (btw this is q5) using the relativity formula, its clear 0.63 s pass between consecutive tiks of the clok as seen from earth however, lets assume it has to travel that extra distance the ship has traveled in the 0.5s, distance = speed x time = 1.8e8 x 0.5 = 9e7 thus...

thats made me start thinking, yeh it is a confusing Q but after thinkin about it - i rekonits (d) Damn!!!! got it wrong

92-97 depending on how they mark it/ what they were looking for/etc...

'quanta to quarks' - the most populasr option topic in physics (45%of ppl do it)

all i got 2 say is EASY AS ..(the option) basically for 6 marker: model split into force carriers (bosons) and fundamental matter particles (fermions), talked about each force and its force carrirer (& hypothesised graviton), then went on to talk about quarks, flavbous, anti quarks, -->...