Search results

The apostrophe symbolises a contraction. You are = you're; I have = I've. If you've been punctuating it like you have your whole life, well, you've been doing it wrong your whole life.

*you're *English

*self-explanatory *your *theories *ideas *abiogenesis Geez dude, at least do a quick once-over of your post before you post it. Being "2nd in English" is no excuse for disrespecting your fellow forum members by not even doing a quick spell-check and grammar-check. To answer your...

I like me grog, though generally not to excess. Cigarettes are smelly and stupid and very unattractive (also, my grandfather died of throat cancer). Drugs? Just not interested imo tbh.

That assumes the Aussie in question isn't also of Asian extraction..?

It only bothers me when their notches stand at 0.

If your daughter achieved puberty early - most don't go through it until 12-15, so 9 is unusual - would you be comfortable with her marrying and having sex with a man three times her age? It doesn't matter if she had reached puberty. At that age, her body has not yet developed enough to...

She was bethrothed at six and the marriage was consummated at 9. My sources to not contradict with each other. Watt, "Aisha", Encyclopedia of Islam Online Amira Sonbol, Rise of Islam: 6th to 9th century, Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Cultures D. A. Spellberg, Politics, Gender, and the...

See: pseudo-phallus in the spotted hyena. NONONONONO NEVER DOUBLE BAG. The two condoms will rub together, creating friction, and they are more likely to fall off or break. SOME BASIC RESEARCH WOULD ASSIST YOU HERE.

Um. You condone child rape just because it was "common". Just because the definitions have apparently changed. She was nine years old. You disgust me.

Mohammad married and had sex with a child. Do you deny this?

Warhammer is not science fiction. Warhammer is fantasy that happens to take place in a futuristic setting.

Lol no, especially when eyewitness accounts are famously inaccurate. Did you see the gorilla? - Telegraph

Because there always is a natural cause. Those kids' "predictions" were only discovered after the fact, and by virtue of probability the chances of some kids, somewhere, spouting enough shit to be counted as a "prophecy" are very high. In fact this is true of all "predictions", unless you can...

Never claimed it was a mass hallucinations (which is a silly argument anyway). And that statement (lack of any known scientific causative factor) simply means we don't know exactly which or which combination of natural phenomena it was, not that there's a lack of explanations at all. The latter...

Presently, no. It can't. But that's okay. It infuriates me when people say "well, we don't yet know what caused it, so lets just say it was supernatural and that God did it!" Oy vey. That's going about it arse-backward. Gravity doesn't follow an equation; the equation follows the phenomena...

You can't prove a negative. Fatima? Miracle? Lol. From the same article: "Steuart Campbell, writing for the 1989 edition of Journal of Meteorology, postulated that a cloud of stratospheric dust changed the appearance of the sun on 13 October, making it easy to look at, and causing it...

And those of us who can't at all - I mean gee thanks, it's not like we chose to have this defect, stop making such a fucking huge deal out of it

Which is retarded because then it becomes our fault

I wish more guys were secure enough to realise this.