Search results

Believing beating up women is okay = great spirit Not believing beating up women is okay = weak minds Yeah. That makes a lot of sense to me too.

Yep, because you clearly believe that violence against women is okay because it was in a fucked-up holy book.

You don't find the story of Muhammad and Aisha disturbing or fucked-up at all?

You think it's okay that men have the right to beat up their wives. Get out of my country.

Okay, better analogy. Your husband wants to cut off your foot. You really don't feel like it, but because you love and care for him, you let him cut off your foot. It's not grievous bodily harm, no!

Once again. Are you seriously defending a man beating up his wife/any woman, for any reason?

Gee, what a surprise! Are you seriously defending a man beating up his wife in any circumstance?

Entirely possible. The pill in general flattens out hormone production, so you don't get the manic spikes of increased hormones (i.e. temporarily increased sex drive).

Planning to resell for ~$10k (lower limit) Can't complain about that

Re: Did you choose the High School you now attend or did your Parents force it on you How about "I had a choice between schools of my parents' selection"

US$695

Re: Did you choose the High School you now attend or did your Parents force it on you I resent the fact that there are only two choices for this poll. I was enrolled into Brigidine, PLC and Abbotsleigh. I got to choose between the three.

Because it was dangerous, retarded, legally considered assault - which is a crime - and a sue-able offence. The school was entirely justified in expelling him, the idiot.

So the moral of the story here is, look up muck-up day policies at different schools before you enroll, if it is that important to you! And I would bet that no statistically significant portion of students "choose" their schools. Feel free to put up that poll, though. You seem to have this...

Lol. Okay. Tell that to the schools. If it's in good fun, like the Knox boys and their annual streak across our ovals? Sure. If it's damaging to the public or potentially sue-able? No. Like I said. Sue-able offence if you assault a member of the public, or hurt someone's precious kid who's...

What in the hell difference does it make that these behaviours are done in the last week of school? Should we excuse previously mentioned negligent drivers just because it's their birthday? Didn't say weapons, but drugs, alcohol and cigarettes? Those only hurt the user. Not others. Are...

That's a stupid analogy and you know it. Again with the straw man. A more apt analogy would be a court finding someone guilty of dangerous/reckless driving even when it doesn't hurt anyone. Schools frankly don't care if what you did actually had any harm or not. This is why students are...

Like I said. If it may result in the school being sued, they don't care. I live in the sue-happy North Shore, and you bet that had one of the Year 12s at my school thrown a water bomb at some member of the public or another student, and had it cause damage, you bet the aggrieved or the...

It's fun if you consent to being waterbombed/egged. It isn't fun when you don't.

Alright ladies and gents, it's pucker time. Do you want to know why waterbombing is punished so severely? Because harmful accidents can and do happen. And you know what is likely to happen if schools don't react strongly to discourage such activity, and in the very unlikely event it does harm...