Search results

It is such a reflection of the male oriented way in which society has been constructed that for the trouble of letting a little jiz out he suddenly accrues a raft of rights pertaining to the woman he had sex with. For you pigs the woman is just an object, a receptacle for the jiz, once his jiz...

Ugh, men.

He has the right to wear a condom.

I think any survey you might find will suggest the impact it has on the woman tends to infinitely greater.

Are they? http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full This is a complete misrepresentation of my views. I never said the development pain sensitivity should preclude abortion. I'm sure you wish I had, that is your habit, to insert augmentations into someone else's...

I said at the beginning of the thread that I think denying a woman a prenatal abortion is tantamount to rape. I stand by that. Those positions you've attributed to me in (2) are pathetic distortions of what I said.

You are talking absolute crap because you feel like being a devils advocate. Absolute crap.

Why are you doing this?

No.

Oh shutup you agree with me.

Because it's not his body that is going to undergo a physical and hormonal roller-coaster.

Because historically generalizations about men have not infiltrated mainstream perceptions to the effect of sanctifying discrimination against men in employment, voting rights etc etc.

These "documents" get amended and repealed all the time to reflect changes in social norms and values. The reason this hasn't changed isn't because we are a static society but because their is no misrepresentation of a social norm, whatever your or my personal views on the issue may be.

Most anti-choice advocates surveyed dropped their stance in cases of Rape, Incest and severe deformities in the unborn child. If you believe the foetus is a human life and you believe in the paramount value of human life, you'd only soften your stance in cases where there was a serious threat to...

Abortion is illegal unless a doctor determines that there is a serious danger to the pregnant woman’s life or to her physical or mental health.

I think it's pretty self evident how someone could come to the conclusion. If you don't accept the rights of "potential human life" are the same as the rights of "actual human life" then it is a victimless act up until it develops pain sensitivity.

I bet you had one fuckwit insisting the school should have been able to get her a band 6 or whatever.

God question, I honestly don't know.

A peoples society.

Yeeeeesssss but probably more 15-16 year old girls getting married off to 22/23 year old boys.