Search results

I'm western Sydney too and I'd make the observation that westies have been vitriolic about every Prime Minister in memory except for about 15 months of Rudd at the start. It is such a feted electorate voters out here will just keep screaming until a major party throws some money at them.

A change to anyone else would have a fallout, a change to Rudd would be a perceived "righting of a wrong" and there is definitely no point them trying to argue that dumping Rudd was not a wrong, the electoral consensus is entrenched on that one. And a five point contraction would just about...

This vote for party business is a fiction, only the deluded don't think the difference between a trusted leader and a mistrusted leader is at least four or five polling points.

Rudd beats Abbott, although pretty well any other Liberal leader would beat Rudd.

No.

(we are just trying to fuck up Powlmao's poll by throwing votes at the fringe candidate,)

You are wrong.

That's an oddly accurate and conciliatory comment from you. I agree with it entirely.

What colour is the sky on your planet?

Stephen Mayne

I reckon way more people are complaining about people complaining about Aussies not winning gold than there are people just complaining about Aussies not winning gold.

In 300 words explain what your point is.

Pure Blood is a Harry Potter term.

You're a wizard?

Aren't you asian? You realize the Liberal party hates you right?

I'm more inclined to say the conduct of every Australian government until Holt was disgusting with regard to immigration and race. But I'd say that Whitlam went some way to dismantling the last vestiges of it. Julia Gillard and John Howard have since seen fit to reintroduce elements of it of course.

We aren't talking about international moneys or international projects we're talking about Australian money going to fund Australian athletes.

I'd wager in Australia more people watched the Shire.

How many people watched the Long Jump?

What, all of them?