Search results

Anyone want to do a quiz/test sort of thing?

Mod's tomorrow. I think I'd prefer this after getting raped by the exam today.

Im hoping 70s-80s as well :(

Re: What did you think? Hard. :(

Chips. :o

Yeah I'm doing the long way, but the marker's notes have always said that we don't need to that step, just write that it must be true for all n>/ w/e. :S

Analyse the source first - the acronyms posted above might help. Usefulness - how useful is it to the historian on the subject matter? Does it provide useful information on the war or on sentiments? Even propaganda is useful, it helps to show the sentiments at the time. Reliable- how reliable...

And don't just assess reliability and usefulness, assess their perspectives as well!

Just remember MOOCCA - motive, origin, omittences, context, content and audience or TOMAC - type, origin, motive, audience, content.

Meh. I got 5 in mind. Pearl Harbor, early advances, Guadalcanal, Home Front and A-bomb.

Probabaly. But it could be like this year's CSSA trial... the influence of the army on German political life from '18 to '39. Nazi consolidation would be good though :D

Lots I guess....ranging from the Ebert-Groener Pact, the influence of von Seeckt in the early years, the election of Hindenburg and the growing impact of army advisors in his inner circle, the political role of von Schleicher and if it extends to the Nazi regime, you got the fact that it was the...

Could they really give a question on the Versailles Treaty? Cos the WWI syllabus only deals with the role and goals of the Big Three. - the roles and differing goals of Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson in creating the Treaty of Versailles. And that has already been set as a question before.

Hmm, Russian Withdrawal could be a question but there's really not that much that we can talk about :S

Talked about how we can obtain photographs, diagrams, models from journals, encyclopaedias, Internet etc etc to compare... then went on to first hand investigation - dating, visual comparisons with fossils, biochemical methods to test for DNA similarites.

And constructing graphs :uhhuh:

Yup to all above... around 4.5uM and a curve shape when I connected the dots.

Russia: - How successful were the Bolsheviks in consolidating their power in Russian society by 1924? - Assess the view that Stalinist Russia was a totalitarian state. Cold War: - Assess the significance of the arms race in the development of the Cold War to '68. - Explain the economic and...

So you'd say something like how "According to the intentionalist historian, Alan Bullock, Hitler was a '.....' ". On the other hand, the structuralist historian, Ian Kershaw points out that '....' [but give an overview of the actual intentionalist/structuralist debate before you quote these guys]?

SA: - Assess the role of the security forces in enforcing the South African govt's apartheid policy. - Assess the significance of the Sharpeville massacre in the development of national resistance to apartheid. Indochina: - Assess the impact of AMerican involvement in Vietnam between 1964 and...