wanton-wonton said:
People who think they're intelligent are never intelligent. (Usually). The opposite also applies.
Anyway, take this for example. A person with a UAI of less than 30 or a person of UAI of 100.
WELL I WONDER WHO IS MORE INTELLIGENT?!?!?!
So yes, to an extent, the HSC does tell how smart one is.
Yes and no.
If the person really exerts themselves and gets a uai of 79, then perhaps, yes, they are unintelligent.
However, there are many different types of intelligence - 'rote learning' intelligence, logical intelligence, creative intelligence, philosophical intelligence, etc.
I got a uai of 92.75, without applying myself very strenuously, but I would think that I can easily be more intelligent than people with 99+UAIs.
In fact, the concept of intelligence is very difficult to define and there has been much debate about it in psychological studies. The gf/gc theory is perhaps the best one - where 'intelligence' is really the culmination of 'crystalised' (i.e. learned) and 'fluid' (i.e. not learned such as spatial abilities, etc etc) knowledge. IQ tests try and rank people based on this principle, but the argument is that someone could be crap in a few categories, and exceptional in some others, does this mean their intelligence level is lower than someone who is just average?
I think the following types of 'intelligence' are actually very important:
-Understanding (or at least opinions) of the world (philosophically, emotionally, mentally, etc). If you're introverted and only understand what is directly in front of you, rather than the grand scheme of things I don't think one is particularly 'intelligent'
-Concept of self: understand your emotions, your thoughts, etc.
-'Book smarts'
-'Street smarts'
-Anal sex having ability.
I think you can only have one of these types of 'intelligence' and be a very intelligent individual (with the first and second being very important to have; and one of the following types completing an 'intelligent individual')
-----------------------------
Regarding uni, one can go very well regardless of UAI (with my UAI of 92.75 I'm far outperforming people who got amazingly high UAIs). This is because in school you get tested on a broader range of subjects, whilst in uni you specialise according to your abilities.
Then again, even uni marks aren't really correlated to intelligence - there are many people that don't want to attain high marks, but may go on to complete phds, etc.