Sux to be them (1 Viewer)

[Tabris]

http://www.student.mq.edu.au/conduct/

 

[hello2004]

Nice read.

This particular case caught my attention:

STUDENT 1 (Division of Linguistics and Psychology)

The student was

1. Guilty of forging signature of an academic on a waiver form.
2. Excluded from enrolment for second half year 2007.
3. Probation for remainder of enrolment.
4. Eligible to re-enrol in 2008 provided he undertook counselling on his return.

How the hell did he/she think they were not going to get caught?

 

[AsyLum]

STUDENT 2 (Division of Economic and Financial Studies)

The student was

1. Found guilty of submitting a forged letter of degree completion and forged academic transcript to another university.
2. Excluded from enrolment permanently.

Huh wut?!

 

[Monstar]

alot of these are efs kids.
I really do feel for some of those international students.. i was speaking to one of them in my accounting tute and he said he doesnt even want to go to uni but his parents are making him.

 

[BackCountrySnow]

Student 1 for prime minister.


STUDENT 1 (PhD candidate – Information and Communication Sciences)

The student was

• Found guilty of unacceptable behaviour involving drunkenness and threatening behaviour towards staff.
• Required to send a written apology to all staff affected.
• Placed on probation.
• Given limited access to the campus and requested to be accompanied by a nominated staff member in any dealings with the Department concerned.
• Required to undertake counselling and provide regular reports from the counsellor.

​

 

[Cyan_phoeniX]

It goes on academic records too, doesn't it? That would be the worst thing, because it would basically make it worthless :/

 

[Cyan_phoeniX]

some interesting ones:



STUDENT 1 (Division of Economic and Financial Studies)

The student was

Guilty of taking unauthorised notes into an exam.
Severely reprimanded.
Already given Fail (0) for unit.
To undertake 50 hours of community service.

STUDENT 5 (Division of Economic and Financial Studies)

The student was

Guilty of cheating in exams.
To undertake 50 hours of community service.
On probation for remainder of enrolment.


STUDENT 2 (Division of Economic & Financial Studies)

It was alleged that the student had interferred with the delivery of voting papers in the student election .
There was no finding of misconduct as the eyewitness reports could not be substantiated.


STUDENT 2 (Division of Economic & Financial Studies)

The student was

Found guilty of a number of charges of misconduct including forging Professional Authority Forms, unauthorised material in examinations, plagiarism and attempting to emotionally blackmail staff.
Excluded from the University permanently.


:/

 

[xeuyrawp]

alot of these are efs kids.
I really do feel for some of those international students.. i was speaking to one of them in my accounting tute and he said he doesnt even want to go to uni but his parents are making him.

Then he should make it a priority to move out of the pathetic excuse of society and join the rest of us in civilisation.

/supremacistrant.

 

[xeuyrawp]

STUDENT 4 (Postgraduate-Division of Humanities)

The student was

• Found guilty of plagiarising the whole of their research project for a unit.
• Excluded for one semester.
• Placed on probation for the remainder of their enrolment.
• Directed to seek counselling from the Dean of the Division.

That's the the worst for me. =/
​

 

[Boxxxhead]

some interesting ones:



STUDENT 1 (Division of Economic and Financial Studies)

The student was

Guilty of taking unauthorised notes into an exam.
Severely reprimanded.
Already given Fail (0) for unit.
To undertake 50 hours of community service.

STUDENT 5 (Division of Economic and Financial Studies)

The student was

Guilty of cheating in exams.
To undertake 50 hours of community service.
On probation for remainder of enrolment.


STUDENT 2 (Division of Economic & Financial Studies)

It was alleged that the student had interferred with the delivery of voting papers in the student election .
There was no finding of misconduct as the eyewitness reports could not be substantiated.


STUDENT 2 (Division of Economic & Financial Studies)

The student was

Found guilty of a number of charges of misconduct including forging Professional Authority Forms, unauthorised material in examinations, plagiarism and attempting to emotionally blackmail staff.
Excluded from the University permanently.


:/

Wow.

 

[Jagermeister.]

old. this was posted early last year

 

[Cyan_phoeniX]

old. this was posted early last year

yeah, but new and imaginative cases have since been processed

 

[ippie]

lol wow they actually post this stuff online?

this is entertaining to read.

 

[Skittled]

When they decide to do one of these for staff, I hope they'll call me up to provide evidence.

What's good for the goose...

(Not sure what smilie fits the cynical-shit-stirring-and-evil-yet-irritable-and-sadly-regrettable smile I've got right now. Who chooses them, anyway?)

 

[xeuyrawp]

(Not sure what smilie fits the cynical-shit-stirring-and-evil-yet-irritable-and-sadly-regrettable smile I've got right now. Who chooses them, anyway?)

^ You know you've done too much psychology when...

o is the closest, really, although that one is kinda embarrassed.)

 

[AsyLum]

STUDENT 3 (Division of Humanities )

The student was

1. Found guilty of forging the signature of a staff member on a loan application.
2. Given a suspended exclusion of 6 months.


errr .. and how does community service help with cheating in exams? a fail is enough that's $600+ down the drain is plenty.

Its just introducing them to the life of a small-time criminal yo.

 

[MaryJane]

The two law ones where they were found cheating on a take-home, I know which lecturer dobbed at least one of the groups in. The lecturer found them in the library of all places doing the exam together. The convenor walked up behind them and snap! Totally busted! The lecturer told us all about it the next year as a threat to not conspire for the take-home exam. It worked

Whats with the post-grad student who plagarised their thesis? The first one, right down the bottom of the page. Surely if they were found 'guilty' of plagarism at undergrad level, then they shouldn't have been accepted to post-grad?!