chelsea girl
everybody knows
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 617
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
no, he is great. he LOVES me for my MIND.
basically he is a REAL MAN.
basically he is a REAL MAN.
His style is definitely different to dom's.Copkiller isn't eloquent enough to be dom. Could be wrong.
He wasn't more eloquent, just more aggressive.What is dom's username? I want to read some posts by the guy who is supposedly like me but more eloquent.
I disagree that he is more eloquent. His username is zimmerman8kWhat is dom's username? I want to read some posts by the guy who is supposedly like me but more eloquent.
*some spiel about coercive with guns redistributive rah rah *such typical Young Liberal hostility.
social democrats would never resort to such aggressiveness!
They're all gone and they're NEVER coming back.I'd suggest reading Schroedinger's posts instead. Every single one of them.
I really, really don't like this.Automatic enrolment processes, whereby personal details provided to other government agencies are used to place people on the electoral roll, are suggested as a remedy to the problem where the Australian Electoral Commission does well at removing wrongly enrolled voters from the roll but less well at getting unenrolled voters on there in the first place. It is noted that the NSW government is examining such a mechanism for its “Smart Roll” project, utilising high school students’ details from the NSW Board of Studies.
But I do love this.The Howard government’s indefensible move to close the electoral roll almost immediately after the issue of the writs is set to be at the very least reversed. There is discussion of pushing the closure even later into the campaign, which technological developments have made easier to achieve, and even of allowing registration on election day, as occurs in Canada and some places in the United States.
Exactly. The goal should be to empower and inform as many people as possible (not just 16 year olds) not to just assume they don't care. That sort of thinking is likely to add to people's sense of disempowerment and apathy. When I was 16, apathy about political issues wasn't 'cause I didn't care. It was 'cause I knew I couldn't do anything about it.How do you expect people to want to be involved and aware if all people do is condemn and patronize their enthusiasm? Government policy impacts on a vast majority of sixteen year olds, why not allow them to have their say?
Compulsory <18 voting would be a fucking nightmare
If it's optional, then you're really only going to get kids who give a shit about politics who will be voting.
Sadly however they will all likely be dumb liberals (as in opposed to conservatives) who will vote for Rudd because of global warming and for trying to stop those 'big evil greedy corporations' :'(