Chemical Ali
지금은 소녀시대
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,728
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
wow you're an amoral sociopath nice jobits not if i may get caught, its if theres a high chance of getting caught or if the risks outweigh the benefits
wow you're an amoral sociopath nice jobits not if i may get caught, its if theres a high chance of getting caught or if the risks outweigh the benefits
yeah you're a cunt I hope we have a draft so you die firstits not if i may get caught, its if theres a high chance of getting caught or if the risks outweigh the benefits
Life for murder, regardless of who the victim is.
oh hey future serial rape killerits not if i may get caught, its if theres a high chance of getting caught or if the risks outweigh the benefits
ok so if a woman is being raped and kills her attacker in the process of escaping say for eample he has a gun and she somehow gets it and shoots him in the face and escapesLife for murder, regardless of who the victim is.
that isn't murder and in nsw you have no right to self defenceok so if a woman is being raped and kills her attacker in the process of escaping say for eample he has a gun and she somehow gets it and shoots him in the face and escapes
mandatory life sentence
HERP DERPall lives are universally equal in their value.
I meant murder without self defence motive should be life. If it's self defence that's a whole other story in itself.ok so if a woman is being raped and kills her attacker in the process of escaping say for eample he has a gun and she somehow gets it and shoots him in the face and escapes
mandatory life sentence
Isn't that the job of the lawyer? Pretty much I would've said unprovoked murderous attack.How can one prove that it was in self defence then?
That's stupid then.Isn't that the job of the lawyer? Pretty much I would've said unprovoked murderous attack.
Hitler (although supposedly it's not true about Hitler)i actually used to be a vegetarian
fun fact
No lawyers aren't proof, but wouldn't you rather have a good than a bad lawyer? For those who can't afford, I'm sure there must be some sort of subsidised legal service available. Local legal centre? I dunno these things, that's why I'm not a lawyer. Yes, and isn't the point of a lawyer not only to defend you, but to counteract and break down the other side's claims? Like you said, if everyone's claim was taken at face value, then there'd be no point for courts and lawyers.That's stupid then.
What about people who can't afford a good lawyer? Besides, lawyers aren't proof.
Hell, if we did what you suggested, everyone would claim it was self defence, which means that nothing has changed
You're fucked. You just completely lost sight of your initial point.No lawyers aren't proof, but wouldn't you rather have a good than a bad lawyer? For those who can't afford, I'm sure there must be some sort of subsidised legal service available. Local legal centre? I dunno these things, that's why I'm not a lawyer. Yes, and isn't the point of a lawyer not only to defend you, but to counteract and break down the other side's claims? Like you said, if everyone's claim was taken at face value, then there'd be no point for courts and lawyers.
do you realise how much money it costs to incarcerate someone for lifeI meant murder without self defence motive should be life. If it's self defence that's a whole other story in itself.