heres more of my 2 cents...
problem is that there isnt any REAL definition of the Australian culture. i dont think culture is defined by the objects we hold or the language we speak. moreso, i think culture has to do with the personality of the individual person, and as a whole, collectively, how they socialise. i always assumed that the aussie way was all laid back, take it nice and easy. this, i believe, stemmed from the convicts, who, when they did become freemen after years and years of hard labour (because they managed to steal a single loaf of bread that was half stale anyway), settled down to be farmers, miners, etc...then that was the best that life had to offer --> freedom. combined with the vast desert in the centre, and lush vegetation in coastal regions, it has birthed the bushman. think banjo patterson, think waltzing matilda, think henry parkes.
i believe an integral part of 'culture' is sports. look at the olympics --> the most amount of medals PER CAPITA, a population of 20 million matching toe-to-toe with the giants of the USA, China, Russia, Japan, Germany, who have significantly larger populations. and the evidence of australia's committement, motivation, populairt and success in the sporting arena doesnt stop there.
but, do realise that when we are talking about multiculturalism, this pretty much only applies to Australia's major cities and its nearby urban sprawls --> Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Hobart, Canberra. in other places, it is absolutely dominated by white australians, or the aboriginal people. so, it is assumed that australia is to be defined by a couple of large cities, and largely have ignored the 'previous' culture of the 'bushman'.
another integral part of 'australian culture' is mateship. think of the Anzacs. Only 20 years after the federation of australia was established, we went to war to the now fabled grounds of Gallipoli. It is strange that a legend was born - of mateship, courage, determination: the diggers - outside Australia. i believe that this is what made australia what australia is today, along with sports, and the 'bushman'. traits of this 'australian legend' also appears in sports as well. consider the NRL premiership trophy --> two captains from opposing sides walking hand in hand after a mud-filled match. could that be how we define australia? tolerance? respect? courage? fight to the bitter end?
personally, i have a feeling that these aspects dont really fit together, but then again, what really does define Australian culture? is australia meant to be established from its British colonist 'roots', or the Aboriginal roots that delve far deeper? is there a way to acknowledge the Anglo Saxon way while not disrespecting AND upholding the Aboriginal culture?
just a nice thought, anyway...