Oh really? We're the only ones doing the pumping? What retarded fucking parochial view do you need to take in order to come to that conclusion? What about Finland? What about The Netherlands? The UK? India? Norway? Denmark? Switzerland? Ireland? Costa Rica? Quebec? New Zealand? Korea? Germany? France? You ignorant fuck.
You just thirty seconds ago said climate change was dwarfed by more significant environmental issues, that was what I was commenting on hence the bold highlighting of that part of you post you imbecile.
Suck my dick Lentern, i didnt google it.
Of course you didn't research it, this time or any other. Because you're an ignorant, parochial wanker who knows nothing about the issue yet feels justified in pontificating about it. And in answer to your question, because it can be stopped which you would know if you weren't about as well informed as a fucking Kardashian.
Aww my arnt we all cranky!
What the fuck does that refer to?
No, really? If you want meto comprehend your whatever it was make it comprehensible please.
You're not seriously doubting the science of anthropogenic global warming are you?
You understand its about mitigating the extent of the damage don't you darling?
Darling we are only delaying the inevitable.
yes climate change is huge however in terms of giving a fuck about humanity the other issues I listed, though some are heavily linked with climate change, are much more pressing and immediate problems
You may be, but we? Have you readsome of what the others have written. In the first instance fuel is exempt from the carbon price, in the second there is money going into these alternatives you refer to? When you say they would have done something by now, what you're overlooking is that the Rudd government initially pursued the approach of negotiating with the liberal and indeed successfully reach an agreement with the Liberal leadership over nearly a year of negotiations. The CPRS had considerably investment into alternative fuels and energy sources but ofcourse with both Abbott and Brown opposing it the CPRS became a dead-in-the-water policy and the government were forced to re-plan.
fuel may be exempt on paper but ofc we all know the interconnectedness of the economy will prove that to not be true
Well effectively it is true thanks to the generous compensation schemes built included into the clean energy bill, the people who will see a genuine increase in their cost of fuel consumption are hardly going to be those who you refered to before as not eating to buy fuel.
It's not spare change, they are throwing real money at what they call green energy alternatives, the solar cities programme, the restructured home insulation plan, the carbon farming initiative, the smart grid smart city initiative, to name a few.
I think you'll find the two governing parties do have a commitment to wind and solar energy, the coalition a commitment to nuclear. You do realise that the investment into green energy programs is not exclusively going to be funded by the Clean Energy Bill right?
