Re: Israel & Palestine
BritneySpears said:
Exactly you are flip flopping around trying to claim ethnicity that you are not. Firstly, you said you are cannaanites who are according to the bible descendants of Ham, the other son of Noah and his other sons are Shem and Japhet. ONLY the descendants of SHEM are called semitic.
Secondly, Arabs are not Canaanites and cannannites do not spread across the middle east from Morocco to yemen. Only Arabs does.
How am I flip flopping around? You're the one who identified me as an Arab, claiming that I couldn't be a semite, and in doing so you made yourself look like a fool. Now, you're doing it again, without knowing my genetic lineage. In genetic terms I am considered to be both. I suppose I can share with you a little about my family history, just to prove that I am both semitic and canaanite, and thus you can no longer call me an Anti-Semite. But, let me just remind you exactly what I said, because you're taking things way out of context. What I said was "Aren't the people of Lebanon Canaanites? Yes they are." I didn't say I was a Canaanite (it's a split faction where the majority in Lebanon the Shia and the Maronite Christians which make up for 60% of the Lebanese population. Were most likely to have the genetic marker of the Canaanite/Phoenician ancestors.)
Regardless, the Point you're continually trying to deflect is this one. How can you criticise the entire Palestinian people because a small minority of them have read "mein kampf"? Especially when the huge majority of the Israeli's read the torah daily. Which asks for the genocide of the Lebanese people.
Now you wanted to ask how it was possible to be both? It's simple. My grandmother from my fathers side was Syrian. (As you know sex-linked inheritance would mean that I would now be considered Semitic.) And my mothers side is completely Lebanese. (Never migrated, and have lived in the same towns for centuries.)
But that is completely redundant and irrelevant.
In that case, yes arabs can be included in semitic, however semitic refers to jews in wider use not arabs.
A few posts ago you ruled out any possibility of "Arabs" being semitic. Infact I think you completely seperated the two as not even being linked. This shows that you need to research this situation more.
In Europe anti-semitic solely refers to jewish not arabs because arabs did not live in Europe
Arabs had no reason to live in Europe. Last I checked we're not in Europe now we live in a country called Australia. The point is that I was called Anti-Semitic which has now been proven redundant. I've already shown that I am not, and can not be Anti-Semitic.
as long as jews and have no history there and are irrelevant in european context in the usage of the term semitic.
We're not in Europe you moron. I was called an Anti-Semite in Australia by and Australian. (For opposing the Inhumane treatment of the Palestinians by Israel.)
But as you want to be semitic ands closer to jews so bad Pick your choice, Arabs and Cannanites are from entirely different background.
Oh, you don't say. (He must have done some research.)
Yes Genetic tests linked Aboriginals with africans, North Indians and Persians with Europeans. Ever heard Indians or Persians claiming we are descendants of germanic and therefore germany or england is their country eh?
Are you a complete moron? Modern day Iranians DO claim that they are Persians. Because they have not left their lands and have a strong genetic link. It's the exact same case with Lebanon. The country and people are descendants of the Canaanites. (It's indisputable. DNA tests have corroborated this.)
No palestinians are in Lebanon because you arabs people use them as a pawn and scapegoat to propagate hatred against Israel.
The statement you have made is perhaps the most imbecilic I have heard in my entire life. The Palestinian people would not have been scattered throughout the Middle-East if their land wasn't occupied by Israel. The people of the Middle-East had no reason to hate Israel, and have no obligation to give all the Palestinians residency into their countries. (Since the Middle-East doesn't occupy their country. The Israelis do.)
They would not be in Lebanon unless you lebs, syrian and egyptian had not declared war on Israel
They were seperated from their lands (which should never have happened.) They had an inalienable right to fight for their country, and the middle eastern countries were only defending an illogical and unlawful decision. Explain why European Jews have a right to displace an entire nation, to form their own.
Now on the treatment of Palestinians, well lets get some facts. Approximately 400,000 Palestinians live in Lebanon. As civilians of Lebanon they would receive notably less aid by U.N and would cause an even tighter strain on the economy. However, you are fundamentally wrong. Only the Palestinians which chose to settle in those camps have not integrated into Lebanese society. The other refugees make up a significant part of Lebanon and are regular citizens
You are completely deflecting the Issue. Why are they there? Why are European Jews in their homes?
And the other issue. How can you criticise 5,000,000 Palestinians who were displaced and scattered throughout the middle east? (Because a small minority of them have read mein kampf.) When the majority of Israelis read the Torah. Which asks for the genocide of the Canaanites (Which would be almost genetically indifferentiable from modern day Lebanese people.)
That's hyposcisy!