I am also confused about this. For those of you who haven't already rolled your eyes at my desperate proposal thread and laughed at my ridiculously verbose and stupid work, I'm doing the causes of the Spanish Civil War. Almost all of my sources are books, though I have a couple of journal articles, so I am very worried about this VARIETY thing (I know they make a big deal out of it in English). But they can't mark us down, can they? I mean, my teacher told me NOT to use websites as they are not considered reliable or sophisticated - what does that leave? I'll ask my teacher...why doesn't everyone do the same? And maybe I'll check out the HTA prize winners' footnotes and bibliographies...Aaaarrrghhhh, remind me why I did this course?!Originally posted by ms.cinderella
salem witch trials - the different interpretations of the cause of it.. the majority of my info comes from books.. do we get marked down if we dont use a range of sources??
true, but the credibility of a source is always in question when its an internet article or essay. As long as you are sensibly selective in your choice of sources then, yes, the internet is able to offer alot.Originally posted by trekkie
Oh and just because its on a website does not mean that the information is not 'reliable of sophisticated'
I tried seeing how I could link historiography with the Howard years, such as what have been the (changing) approaches to the Liberal Party and in particular the Howard Government, if Howard is the most conservative PM to date, conservatism vs liberalism, and more or less where Australia is heading with John Howard.is there a lot of historiography on howard?