The Cauchy principal value would be 0. Otherwise it's an undefined expression -inf + inf.
The answer is obviously that it does not, but I want to check if my proof is flawed.
I have a feeling I may have needed to consider the negative infinity portion of this integral?
Does it make sense to ask convergence of an integral whose CPV is 0?
The answer is obviously that it does not, but I want to check if my proof is flawed.
I have a feeling I may have needed to consider the negative infinity portion of this integral?
yeah, that's just the CPV.They didn't teach us about the Cauchy principal value. I only found that on WolframAlpha.
Edit: Though they did make us evaluate this
I suppose the question was just meant to distinguish between the two. But like I said, our course makes no reference to CPV.yeah, that's just the CPV.
My bad. Question still holds out of my fatigue though please?Typo? 'a' is 'p'?
It ends up just being the p-test when you do a change of variables (substitute u = ln(x)).Bit of guidance needed here.
The -t in the exponential should become -1/x , rather than 1/x.
(I know this is the Gamma function)
I had an idea but then I got lost. My last step was rewriting the integral as
Mistake in typing, my badThe -t in the exponential should become -1/x , rather than 1/x.
Yeah it's essentially a comparison test.Having already shown
The method the answers provided is not immediately obvious to me and I don't understand the lateral thinking required. Can someone please explain the intuition required to see this method or just provide an easier pathway?