marxman
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 51
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2016
It's correct, but I wonder how Paradoxica did it by inspection.A bit tedious though, so after using log laws, u = cos2x, u = tan theta, f(x) = f(a-x), I got -1/64. is that right?
61root(2)/840 right? What I did was break up the sin part, get three different integrals, one of which is easy to work out, then for the other two I created a recursion formula for the integral of sec(x)^n from 0 to pi/4, and added/subtracted the three integrals, and got that. I might post working, but it is unbelievably messy.This definite integral must be positive because the integrand is a complete square.
Sorry it's my fault. I accidentally missed out the exponent on the numerator when I typed it in latex.61root(2)/840 right? What I did was break up the sin part, get three different integrals, one of which is easy to work out, then for the other two I created a recursion formula for the integral of sec(x)^n from 0 to pi/4, and added/subtracted the three integrals, and got that. I might post working, but it is unbelievably messy.
Oh yeah I meant my working was messy as in illegible haha.Sorry it's my fault. I accidentally missed out the exponent on the numerator when I typed it in latex.
Nevertheless, the mistyped integral is not messy. I just attempted it and the integrand can be broken into 0.5 sin x/(cos x)^7 and -0.5(sec x)^6. Substitue u=cos x and u=tan x respectively.
Well this one is 22/7 - pi, I just did some algebra to break down the expression to tan(x)^4(1-tan(x))^4, made a substitution u=tanx and just some relatively easy integration from there. I did have to use the binomial theorem in the last integral though, I feel like there would be a more elegant way to do it.This definite integral must be positive because the integrand is a complete square.
(Sorry for the typo in numerator this afternoon.)
This is obviously false because we all know that pi = 22/7.This is of course a proof that 22/7 > pi.
What???? I though pi = 3.14!!! Mind = blown.This is obviously false because we all know that pi = 22/7.
My life has been a lie.This is obviously false because we all know that pi = 22/7.
That's correct!!!Well this one is 22/7 - pi, I just did some algebra to break down the expression to tan(x)^4(1-tan(x))^4, made a substitution u=tanx and just some relatively easy integration from there. I did have to use the binomial theorem in the last integral though, I feel like there would be a more elegant way to do it.
http://imgur.com/a/YGobhThis question relies on Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and substitution.
http://imgur.com/a/YGobhThis question relies on Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and substitution.
The approach is correct. Well done!http://imgur.com/a/YGobh
I hope that is clear enough. If not I'm trying to learn LaTeX so if it's too blurry/messy I can transcribe it to be readable haha.
http://imgur.com/a/QAcfP
What's your final answer? Can't seem to spot it.