Last edited:
Ah yes that makes sense, and so much simpler than my proof. Thank you!
http://imgur.com/a/X7CkWThis one is a bit tedious.
Still learning what? LaTeX, or Integration?http://imgur.com/a/X7CkW
EDIT: Yeah I have no idea how to make the LaTeX valid here imgur will have to do haha. Also I'm still learning so if I can improve anywhere just tell me what to do.
LaTeXStill learning what? LaTeX, or Integration?
I guess you can post your LaTeX attempts (or do it in the LaTeX Practice Thread) and people may give LaTeX tips then (since then we can see what's wrong with the code, if anything).LaTeX
I disagree. With the initial substitution , the standard reflection formula may be applied and we obtain the following equivalence after simplification:This one is a bit tedious.
Using the reflection across the real line with u+x=0, and Glasser's Master Theorem (ceebs showing the intended way but KingOfActing can do that), the integral simplifies completely into:By considering
evaluate:
Perhaps. That's why I can do this one.Reckon q2 is 2u?
Yes. I did it by inspection but had to show the steps.Can't you do two by inspection?
http://m.imgur.com/j3kDVl4
Correct! One of those ones where you have to complete the square then do the appropriate trig sub and fiddle with a right angled triangle...http://m.imgur.com/j3kDVl4
Q1 answer, it's messy so if you can't understand it or read it then tell me. I don't know if there's a faster method but if there is please tell me.