katie tully
ashleey luvs roosters
Not all dole recipients are druggies, but all druggies are dole recipients. Har
wasnt howard in power for 13 yearsMore like, there needs to be a sex maximum amount of time you can be on the dole AND the reporting procedures for job seekers need to be more stringent.
As far as I know, all you have to do is say you've applied for job x,y,z but you didn't get the job.
It could be like a big camp. A camp with a mass concentration of people.Why dont we build a place where people get shelter and 3 meals a day. No more rent assisstance, unemployment benefit, etc. We could save billions per year.
"Always".Yah, good idea. Y we're at it y not grow and supply free drugs to the inmates with the money saved?
There's a reason y both of us are -rep - we're alwayz right!
No.It's a shit idea from a shit TS.
Delete the thread
Proposition a) Welfare recipients have not got their shit togetherWhat? You're blowing this up to be something it's not. The idea is that if you're in receipt of the dole you should be honestly and sincerely:
(a) looking for work; and
(b) attempting to get your shit together in general.
Centrelink already requests bank statements and evidence of your job searching activities as a condition of the allowance, why is this a bridge too far?
1 in 6 rely working age people below retirement age rely on welfare payments.The welfare system is far too lenient.
In reality though, what choice do we have?
There is only a small percentage of the population who rely solely on social security for subsistence. Without it, we are condemning society to a world of far greater problems.
Then the lesson to you would be to stop making stupid threads.if i had have made this thread the you'd have moved it to NS so fast
stop being such a shitty and hypocritical mod plx
Most of them would be on the DSP (a system with some problems), rather than unemployment though?1 in 6 rely working age people below retirement age rely on welfare payments.
Australia's welfare system is not mean but different and fairer - On Line Opinion - 17/9/2004
I think the DSP has more then some problems. Even if you think that most people on the DSP have a genuine disability that presents then from working and most unemployed people are genuinely trying to find a job the number of people dependent on the taxpayer is scary.Most of them would be on the DSP (a system with some problems), rather than unemployment though?