thanks Sam. You too.3unitz said:get well soon
Its not the flu actually - just sick & tired.
thanks Sam. You too.3unitz said:get well soon
I don't know, what I do know is those forces which we cannot test/do not see needn't form a part of our reality.Do you agree that there is likely forces that we do not see and cannot test in this universe?
What does 'being with God' mean?Ultimate meaning? To be with God.
If nothing came before 'a' then 'a' mustve always been there.Enteebee said:Can I ask you a question btw? Do you accept the big bang theory? As far as I understand, from observations we have made it appears that time began sometime around 13.7 billion years ago with a 'big bang', all of the components of our universe having existed since time=0 (the amount of matter/energy the same). What caused time to begin? You can't have a 'cause' without time, so before time there is no need for a cause. There was no moment before this moment, this moment was time=0, to ask what came before time=0 is to ask what letter comes before a in the alphabet.
If those forces are what we base our beliefs upon , then they NEED to be a part of our reality.Enteebee said:I don't know, what I do know is those forces which we cannot test/do not see needn't form a part of our reality.
What does 'being with God' mean?
Space/Matter etc have been there since time=0, that is effectively "always", since time has existed space/matter have existed. There is no 'before' time any more than there is a square circle. There was no time before the big bang, it just "was", then time existed.If nothing came before 'a' then 'a' mustve always been there.
I can ask what came before , so i will
And if nothing did come before 'a', then 'a' has always been there.
I think the big bang theory is the most credible scientific explanation Ive ever heard...its just when working back to as you called it "a"....it loses some credibility. Basic foundation gone.
Just sounds like a blanket, fuzzy term to me... I doubt you have any more a grasp of a meaning than I do.You know when you spend time with someone? You're with them , you're being with them.
Are you saying that space, time and matter all came into being at once?Enteebee said:Space/Matter etc have been there since time=0, that is effectively "always", since time has existed space/matter have existed. There is no 'before' time any more than there is a square circle. There was no time before the big bang, it just "was", then time existed.
It seems to work pretty well without a god.
Just sounds like a blanket, fuzzy term to me... I doubt you have any more a grasp of a meaning than I do.
You do not feel that being with someone is a reality? You think this conversation you are having with me is all in your head? A fuzzy feeling?Enteebee said:Space/Matter etc have been there since time=0, that is effectively "always", since time has existed space/matter have existed. There is no 'before' time any more than there is a square circle. There was no time before the big bang, it just "was", then time existed.
It seems to work pretty well without a god.
Just sounds like a blanket, fuzzy term to me... I doubt you have any more a grasp of a meaning than I do.
No, I'm saying that space/matter/energy etc exist at time=0, they don't "come" into being, they just are there, they're reality.*TRUE* said:Are you saying that space, time and matter all came into being at once?
Ive never heard that before if thats what you said.
I don't think "being with god" brings any meaning to your life in reality, to me at least it is completely unclear what 'being' with god would entail and I cannot imagine how you could explain it through analogy to 'being' with a person.*TRUE* said:You do not feel that being with someone is a reality? You think this conversation you are having with me is all in your head? A fuzzy feeling?
Space, energy and matter have always existed , they are eternal?Enteebee said:No, I'm saying that space/matter/energy etc exist at time=0, they don't "come" into being, they just are there, they're reality.
The thing with big bang theory is that it doesn't attempt to explain the actual origin point of the universe, it's an explanation for the expansion of the universe after that point. (Someone correct me if I'm failing mah science here). We don't actually know anything about the exact moment of the "creation" of the universe.*TRUE* said:If nothing came before 'a' then 'a' mustve always been there.
I can ask what came before , so i will
And if nothing did come before 'a', then 'a' has always been there.
I think the big bang theory is the most credible scientific explanation Ive ever heard...its just when working back to as you called it "a"....it loses some credibility. Basic foundation gone.
It bring alot of meaning to my life , in reality.Enteebee said:No, I'm saying that space/matter/energy etc exist at time=0, they don't "come" into being, they just are there, they're reality.
I don't think "being with god" brings any meaning to your life in reality, to me at least it is completely unclear what 'being' with god would entail and I cannot imagine how you could explain it through analogy to 'being' with a person.
Thanks^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:The thing with big bang theory is that it doesn't attempt to explain the actual origin point of the universe, it's an explanation for the expansion of the universe after that point. (Someone correct me if I'm failing mah science here). We don't actually know anything about the exact moment of the "creation" of the universe.
We just as atheists do not attempt to fill that gap in knowledge with a Creator, because there's no more proof that one exists than we have information about any other means of the universe coming into existence.
Idk how well I'm explaining this btw so i'll let someone with more expertise take it from there.
What origin point of the universe? This idea of a 'point' seems to be stuck in the thinking of time existing. The way it works is like this... Space, matter, energy etc exist at time=0 - Then time begins. There is no 'before' then, there is no 'time' before the begining of time.The thing with big bang theory is that it doesn't attempt to explain the actual origin point of the universe, it's an explanation for the expansion of the universe after that point. (Someone correct me if I'm failing mah science here). We don't actually know anything about the exact moment of the "creation" of the universe.
But if there's no before how can you say "then time begins"? It would have to have just always been.Enteebee said:What origin point of the universe? This idea of a 'point' seems to be stuck in the thinking of time existing. The way it works is like this... Space, matter, energy etc exist at time=0 - Then time begins. There is no 'before' then, there is no 'time' before the begining of time.
If you say "always" that implies time has already begun. What I mean by 'then time begins' is that time goes from time=0 to time=>0, time=0 is a state where we can't talk about before, it isn't that it has "always" existed it just exists.But if there's no before how can you say "then time begins"? It would have to have just always been.
Oh ok.Enteebee said:If you say "always" that implies time has already begun. What I mean by 'then time begins' is that time goes from time=0 to time=>0, time=0 is a state where we can't talk about before, it isn't that it has "always" existed it just exists.
Well, obviously in the end this all comes down to a value judgement... but I personally can't see myself valuing 'being with god' just because he's god, unless obviously by his decree. It sounds like words that have no more meaning than to say "the meaning in my life is to be", well... you are being... and you are with god, what then is the meaning of being, or the meaning of being with god?It bring alot of meaning to my life , in reality.
An analogy of being with a friend is a perfect example.
No , but energy , space and matter have ALWAYS EXISTED , am i right?Enteebee said:If you say "always" that implies time has already begun. What I mean by 'then time begins' is that time goes from time=0 to time=>0, time=0 is a state where we can't talk about before, it isn't that it has "always" existed it just exists.
Fair enoughEnteebee said:Well, obviously in the end this all comes down to a value judgement... but I personally can't see myself valuing 'being with god' just because he's god, unless obviously by his decree. It sounds like words that have no more meaning than to say "the meaning in my life is to be", well... you are being... and you are with god, what then is the meaning of being, or the meaning of being with god?