INVASion OF THE LESBIAN BODY SNATCHES LAWL FEMINIST COATHAGNER WARS FUCK!robbie1 said:Yes men should keep their pants on if they dont want a baby. But generally its women who support abortion - claiming its their bodies when it really isnt.
replace nobody with "not all", basically.robbie1 said:"Supposed" commandments that nobody abides by ?
*shakes head and walks away*
I love how Christian Males don't care about the emotional impact it would have on a woamn to be forced to carry a rapists baby for 9 months and give birth to it.robbie1 said:No.
If rape led to pregnancy, the child should be baptised and given to someone who is willing to care for it. There are always people who want to adopt.
Thats assuming the mother is unable to care for it. If she wants to keep it then good on her and God will help her raise it.
Incorrect, I know it wouldn't be easy. The woman would be devestated, but with God's help she can see it through and give the baby up for adoption. Rape or not, she is still bringing life into the world.*Minka* said:I love how Christian Males don't care about the emotional impact it would have on a woamn to be forced to carry a rapists baby for 9 months and give birth to it.
It is because it will never happen to you and you don't care about women.
In order for the state to interfere the burden of proof lies on their shoulders. Prove to me my body belongs to Jesus and I'll gladly abstain from sex until such point as I get married. Also that's a gross generalisation, cause last time I checked a very large chunk of the pro-choicers in this thread had penises.robbie1 said:Yes men should keep their pants on if they dont want a baby. But generally its women who support abortion - claiming its their bodies when it really isnt.
Abortion isn't murder, because it's not unlawful and very rarely malicious.robbie1 said:Do not commit murder is one of the Ten Commandments.
Have you ever worked on the Sabbath?robbie1 said:"Supposed" commandments that nobody abides by ?
*shakes head and walks away*
I'm sick of reciting this argument:robbie1 said:Incorrect, I know it wouldn't be easy. The woman would be devestated, but with God's help she can see it through and give the baby up for adoption. Rape or not, she is still bringing life into the world.
People dont realise these days how much God can actually help us. I can probably speak for a lot of people on this forum when I say that our granparents and great-granparents had much harder lives than we do today.
My great grandfather for example, lived to see 3 wars (WW1, WW2 and the war in Croatia). He grew up in poverty and during times where food was scarce. He had to engage in back braking labour to earn a few cents so they had bread to eat.
Yet, he never complained. He was very holy and God took away all the pain. These days, people feel a little upset and claim to have "depression", which people like my GGF probably felt to a much larger extent. But people prayed back then, and God helped them. Today, we have it so much easier yet everyone has depression because they cant handle a bit of stress - they dont pray and even worse they mock God.
My point is that victims of rape should seek help from God. They will recieve it if they seek it with all their heart. So therefore, abortion is not necessary under any circumstances.
Me, I just like the thought of killing things. DEATH TO THE FOETUSES!withoutaface said:Also that's a gross generalisation, cause last time I checked a very large chunk of the pro-choicers in this thread had penises.
If you kill another living human being knowingly and willingly, you are a murderer - its not in any way a complex line of thought I assure you, it just requires a little common sense.secret said:Very small minority who appose it ay? I would assume there is millions actually. However, I see your point but it's not argued or evaluated well.
I'd like you to give me the exact reason why you think they should carry the label murderer? Also, discuss the reasons you personally hold a strong resentment towards them? -I can sense the resentment you have towards them by the tone of your text.
I ain't trying to attack you, I am simply interested in your opinions and am learning from them.
Not only do I feel you should've written a warning before you posted that picture link, could you please supply the website link of where that picture was taken? It just seems unreliable sitting there with no context.robbie1 said:So, this is what you people support:
WARNING: graphic and NSFW http://www.geocities.com/kekogut/images/10_week.jpg
Animals.
Fuck yes, make mine a double.robbie1 said:So, this is what you people support:
WARNING: graphic and NSFW http://www.geocities.com/kekogut/images/10_week.jpg
You'r animals.
But why? Its not "alive", why would you want a warning?ur_inner_child said:Not only do I feel you should've written a warning before you posted that picture link, could you please supply the website link of where that picture was taken? It just seems unreliable sitting there with no context.
Correct, I was not aborted. Ten points to the man in the fez!bshoc said:So I take it then, omgzergrush, that you were a parasitic growth that never stopped being a parasite?
That's little to do with the argument and more along BoS guidelines.bshoc said:But why? Its not "alive", why would you want a warning?
Same reason people may want a warning before visiting a site like www.ratemypoo.com, I guess. I mean, it's not alive, but it's not everyone's cup of tea either. Are you trying to be fucking retarded, or is today just a bad day for you?bshoc said:But why? Its not "alive", why would you want a warning?
I generally dont see life as equal to parasite, but your case may just be an exception.ogmzergrush said:Correct, I was not aborted. Ten points to the man in the fez!