hey, just wanna know BOS gives ranks too double check for errors, why don't they also give out raw skool assessment marks as they are equally important with ranks? I'm pretty sure teachers might make mistakes in that also.
doingHSC said:hey, just wanna know BOS gives ranks too double check for errors, why don't they also give out raw skool assessment marks as they are equally important with ranks? I'm pretty sure teachers might make mistakes in that also.
I was looking at school assessment moderator, just say if ur ranked 2nd but the mark difference between u and the 1st position is great, ur moderated school assessment mark has a big difference (and vice versa). So I don't think rank is more important--they're equally important.Cactus said:The raw school marks are less important than your rankings. Only the raw mark of the people ranked 1st and last in a class are relvant. I think.......
doingHSC said:I was looking at school assessment moderator, just say if ur ranked 2nd but the mark difference between u and the 1st position is great, ur moderated school assessment mark has a big difference (and vice versa). So I don't think rank is more important--they're equally important.
true, that's why I said James ruse students (and from other good schools) are so lucky......cuz there is very low probability of them stuffing up in final examsRagerunner said:Just note that when your coming first, second third or whatever, that doesn't necesarilly mean you will get a good moderated assessment mark.
When you are ranked first, if you given the highest exam mark as your moderated assessment mark. As a result, if the highest exam mark isn't very high, then your moderated assessment mark won't be very high.
The thing is, it's not because it's 'James Ruse' that makes it lucky.doingHSC said:true, that's why I said James ruse students (and from other good schools) are so lucky......cuz there is very low probability of them stuffing up in final exams