Aryanbeauty
Member
John Kerry was very popular with rest of the world, just like Obama, he lost to George Bush.
I didn't say I wasn't aware of those things or their importance, I was asking what you thought they were. I'm not on a high horse, you've obviously followed this much closer than I have so I wanted to hear your real opinions, rather than just the generalities (e.g. "broad-reaching political currents"). Sorry for not making myself clear.Trefoil said:You're not interested in what others think of the candidates? You're not interested in where swing voters might lean after the debates? Fair enough. Do get off your high horse though, because others are interested.
You say you've watched the debate, then tell me you're not aware of broad-reaching political currents in this election? You hear that around the world there is more support for Obama over McCain, then you ask how that is relevant? It doesn't occur to you instead to ask why; why is there so much more support for Obama instead of McCain, and how does the global political landscape relate to the situation in America locally?
Well you see the problem is that in US politics we have two parties and two viewpoints:sam04u said:Risky either way.
After listening to the recent debate, and Obama's unwillingness to intervene after McCain spoke known lies. It's further become evident that Obama may either be too timid to bring about the reforms in U.S foreign policy that is needed, or rather supports the current neoconservative agenda.
For insance McCain continually said that Ahmadinejad had threatened to wipe Israel off the map. That is a lie.
McCain implied Russia escalated the conflict with Georgia. That is a lie.
The list goes on of known lies which Obama let McCain get away with. These lies need to be confronted head on.
This is one of the reasons why Obama had to lose this debate. He could not have stated the truth that Ahmadinejad is not an evil lunatic and that Russia was right to take action against the genocide in South Ossetia, since such viewpoints are politically unacceptable to the American public and unpatriotic. Not only was he forced to agree with McCain, any equivocation would be seen as weakness, indecisiveness, inability to assume the role of commander in chief.sam04u said:Risky either way.
After listening to the recent debate, and Obama's unwillingness to intervene after McCain spoke known lies. It's further become evident that Obama may either be too timid to bring about the reforms in U.S foreign policy that is needed, or rather supports the current neoconservative agenda.
For insance McCain continually said that Ahmadinejad had threatened to wipe Israel off the map. That is a lie.
McCain implied Russia escalated the conflict with Georgia. That is a lie.
The list goes on of known lies which Obama let McCain get away with. These lies need to be confronted head on.
hmmm Commander in chief gotta be tough strong man with lots and lots of guns_dhj_ said:This is one of the reasons why Obama had to lose this debate. He could not have stated the truth that Ahmadinejad is not an evil lunatic and that Russia was right to take action against the genocide in South Ossetia, since such viewpoints are politically unacceptable to the American public and unpatriotic. Not only was he forced to agree with McCain, any equivocation would be seen as weakness, indecisiveness, inability to assume the role of commander and chief.
yeah, and look what happened.Aryanbeauty said:John Kerry was very popular with rest of the world, just like Obama, he lost to George Bush.
Abortion?_dhj_ said:This is one of the reasons why Obama had to lose this debate. He could not have stated the truth that Ahmadinejad is not an evil lunatic and that Russia was right to take action against the genocide in South Ossetia, since such viewpoints are politically unacceptable to the American public and unpatriotic. Not only was he forced to agree with McCain, any equivocation would be seen as weakness, indecisiveness, inability to assume the role of commander in chief.
Views on foreign policy are inevitably blinded by patriotism. With respect to other areas I think a moderate, non-committal stance is politically acceptable.Iron said:Abortion?
Stem cell research?
Gay marriage?
Climate change?
There are lots more things he has to lose on
when are you going to serve your 3 year stint as a soldier for isreal?Aryanbeauty said:Good to see both candidates 99.99% comitted to the security of Israel. Hizbollocks and Ahmedinajad must be pulling their hairs out in anger!
The poor thing, I feel sorry for her now.Capitol Hill sources are telling me that senior McCain people are more than concerned about Palin.
The campaign has held a mock debate and a mock press conference; both are being described as “disastrous.” One senior McCain aide was quoted as saying, “What are we going to do?” The McCain people want to move this first debate to some later, undetermined date, possibly never. People on the inside are saying the Alaska Governor is “clueless.”