Iron
Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2004
- Messages
- 7,765
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
Style and substance. I found McCain to be comprehensive and reassuring. He also ran a clean debate which oozed integrity. He made a few good jokes, he looked more dignified by not personally addressing Obama, and he easily handled a very sup-par Obama. Obviously, I was more sold on the f.p message, but I think most people are too. McCain looked stronger, wiser and more resolute. I think people suspected that already, and had it confirmed. But the suspicion that McCain is past it - too old to keep up and stay cohesive - was put to rest.
Obama was all soundbites, he often (unsuccessfully) tried to talk over McCain, his charisma was surprisingly hollow (telling McCain "good job, good job" after etc), I think he even suggested he would attack Pakistan, but would give the Iranians the political gift of meeting him to discuss their plans to destroy Israel. Weak, naive, confused, opportunistic.
I mean, Obama was solid, but I think that the bar was much higher for him and much lower for McCain, and it turns out that Obama didnt reach his bar and McCain sprang over his
Obama was all soundbites, he often (unsuccessfully) tried to talk over McCain, his charisma was surprisingly hollow (telling McCain "good job, good job" after etc), I think he even suggested he would attack Pakistan, but would give the Iranians the political gift of meeting him to discuss their plans to destroy Israel. Weak, naive, confused, opportunistic.
I mean, Obama was solid, but I think that the bar was much higher for him and much lower for McCain, and it turns out that Obama didnt reach his bar and McCain sprang over his