Search results

What? Take the child from her? If you have a child and you're poor/can't work/don't have family to help you, you have to give up your child? Not necessarily a terrible idea. Either way to me I still don't like the idea of society having to pay for two people's mistakes and they don't have to pay...

That would be silly anyway: - This text is proof of God. - You have to believe in God to properly understand the text. So in order to find out whether God exists, I have to read this text.. but in order to read it properly I already need to accept that God exists? :/ Well, I guess because...

No, all you'd have to do is make it legal for a guy to sign a waiver saying he does not want to have responsibility for the child (in the case that she wants to have the baby and he does not). However, there are still problems with this:

So sam can continue to answer when he gets back, No it doesn't.

may-b yous gaiz shuld lyk marri

A woman having an unwanted pregnancy and having to deal with the issues associated with that is a bad thing.

All that 'untapped potential' stuff is BS. We use ALL of our brain, well... at least most of us do.

They have continued even as Israel has made moves to move out to internationally recognised borders.

I'll try to find the article, but I believe it's been proven that all people will use logic to justify their beliefs (sometimes flawed of course) - despite what some people say. Perhaps an obvious point, but I think it needs to be pointed out. It is extremely beautiful from my perspective...

Give me your definition then. I don't believe in such things so I don't really know what sort of a definition I would give. Where's your evidence for that? Maybe 'God' is the devil and vice-versa. You have no evidence, you're just guessing... thus why it's silly when your belief is about on...

Perhaps so but I don't see how I need to comprehend his words/teachings to believe he exists. I may not be able to comprehend the words/teachings of voltaire but i'm pretty sure he existed. Of course not, but why would you believe in something you have no evidence for? No but I can measure...

If you give men the right to absolve their legal responsibility to the baby however and the mother goes through with it, then society has to pick up any possible slack in absense of the man. The man is at the very least more responsible than society, so should be forced to pick up some of the...

Well because God might not even be there. If God actually is there, then I'll try to comprehend his/her teachings (which you magically claim no one can). I have the desire within to discover God, but even if I didn't I don't see how that would matter much? I think you should watch/read...

There's also a problem here. We already have laws which have been proven that govern the universe. Good idea, me too.

Why would it cause it to 'diffuse into concentrations of higher and lower energy and cause an entropy effect'.... Your first claim was that there was ONE law to start off, that there is energy in a finite amount. There are no other laws so I don't understand what is effecting it. I.e. what made...

To claim you have a solid scientific theory for the existance of God is just as bad. Actually I can. What 'Laws' are you even talking about? You've made them all up off of no evidence as far as I can tell, they're not 'universally accepted laws' and if they are please give me a wikipedia...

You already published your theory on a public internet forum, I can post it where ever I want - I haven't claimed it as my own. There are alot of people on that forum whom know alot about physics, I'm helping you by showing it to them for a more thorough analysis. It seems they might think it a...

I posted Sam's theory here: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=61328 Reply so far; lol.

If the universe continues to expand (more than gravity causes it to collapse), eventually everything will cool down and reach maximum entropy. Life is just a mechanism to redirect entropy (more or less, in my opinion), so it won't have any impact on physics. Matter will continue to be distict...

Nope... It's basically this; - Universe was created by something. - That something was supernatural and not from our universe. - That makes it pretty powerful. Has no other implications. Impossible. Whenever you assert something with supernatural powers it cannot be more 'plausible'...