Search results

no the enlargement factor is 4? Q25 (a) (i) (2)? because 50/20 : 200/80 making it 4? whoever said it was 2 is definately wrong

i never knew there was 2003 specimen? where did u get it from?

shit we need a compass? i haven't used one of them since year10

i can't believe people ran out of time? hmmm maybe i did really bad or something but even though i promised myself i would never leave a hsc exam early, after sitting there for forty minutes with nothing to do i left with 20 minutes to go! although i have never stayed in an ipt for its full...

hmm but people might seriously think they are going to get band 6 if they were so confident they'd name themselves

hmmmm 3 three people have said they will get a band six according to the poll...i wonder who they are seeing as no one has owned up in here? and Ms 12 and Ringo are saying band 5 i definately wouldnt be so sure about bein a band 6

u serious? so i do arts for one year and then i want to combine it with law, they still look at my uai? i thought they looked at your marks in the subject and you just have to get like a distinction average or something?

but Donoghue v Stevenson was under tort law not contract law? and common law negligence doesn't have any thing to do with a contract?

i was hoping for band six but after crime definately band 5

i chose native title im starting to wish i didn't though

from the looks of it i think everyone got at least one or two wrong in the mutli's!

what band do you think you will be in for legal?

did anyone write their number on the top of every page? i just did it on the cover? is the whole exam marked by one person or do they like separate each section?

i didn't write 6 pages? who the fuck eva said i did? i said i used a booklet for it, not the whole booklet? two pages out of it?

i think there is an argument that it could be c, because native title simply means, "the right to live on land to which one has such title and use it for traditional purposes" now this wasn't recognised in AUSTRALIAN law until the mabo case, however it was always a feature of customary law...

i used 7 booklets, although one of them was for the 6 marker human rights question... i wanted to make sure that i got 6/6 by writing started of tiny with about 12 words per line but by the end of my workplace essay there were only like 5 words on each line

but no contract exists between the consumer and the manufacturer? i don't understand how it could be right, i think you would only get the mark if you put tort

yeh but they shouldn't have "stupid" people answering questions... i rang up and asked a question for english about julius caesar >what the techniques decuis uses to change how caesar thinks of calpurnia's dream? the lady told me she didn't know what the technique was called so i sat on the line...

i was going to do law at wollongong but deicided i'm guarenteed to get into arts at sydney so i'll do that for a year and then combine it with law... my parents were so much more pleased with the thought of sydney uni over wollongong, they fail to understand that there is nothing special about...

not really because there was more criteria to fill for individuals, i'd say mine was 65 individuals and then 35 society