Search results

Upon doing trial papers, of which I have many for Legal Studies, I found this question: "Discuss how tort law has developed as a reflection of past and present society." (6) What sort of question is that? Grrr......

I hope it's not law and justice - as in longer questions - I get confused with the terms of equality.....argh.

I think I get it now. What confused me was the fact that death remained the same in the two religious traditions whilst communion and synagogue, are different, although they are both rites of public worship. Essentially we have to address the effects on the everyday lives of believers and two...

I am so confused with the Religious Rites part of the syllabus. If I have chosen to do death as a Rites of Passage, I do that for both Christianity and Judaism (my chosen/given religious traditions), whilst for Rites of Public Worship, for Christianity there is Communion Services and for Judaism...

* continues dancing to queue music *

* dances to queue music *

Thankyou :) I shall ring now. Do you have to wait long?

That's ok, I know exactly what you mean. Although, I probably blabbed on a bit too much for what I was trying to say, if I do not have time to write out a full response, are essay plans just as good, outlining what you would write for that question?

As it is getting closer and closer to the HSC, I do not believe there is an abundance of time to do all of the exam questions, for example in Legal Studies I have so many trial papers it is not funny, does anyone believe that 'essay plans' would be just as beneficial, or not really?

Apparently, it says also a summary of your question, what if you have more than one?

How has everyone grouped the speeches or paired them up? Which one goes with which the best? I have a few pairings, but apparently it is better to choose speeches from different contexts in order to compare values and devices etc etc etc? What does everyone think?

No worries :)

what?!?!?!?!

ratification is a response, that is, how they enact a international treaty into domestic law, that is probably a more formal response, from there you can specify a particular law that has been enacted to address an international law, possible mention state sovereignty, possibly have a negative...

Within the HSC Notes from the Marking Centre, it states the words 'valid', 'reliable' and 'bias', so you could essentially incorporate those words into a response, or a response to any such similar question that we will get. In addition, there are notes from the Excel textbook, or another...

Do they see how many times one person calls? Say if one person fobs you off, could you ring again straight away to get another teacher or expert? I have yet to call, but I am planning on doing so tomorrow. When is it the busiest?

what is "I would assume first affirmative..."?

Good point that. That is why I thought text-by text analysis of journey is better suited to adapting to the question they give you in the exam, but that is just my theory. I guess I am just trying to reasure myself here :)

So does that mean the principles within the international treaty entirely enacted within the domestic legislation even if it is simply attached to it as a schedule?

Thanks heaps. That will really help me to work out my essay plans. That has actually really cleared it up, thank you heaps :) :) :) . Have you written out an essay to study from or is each text individually studied?