Search results

Refer to the opinions of the psychologists and medical authorities on the wikipedia page linked. Or are you going to say that doesn't represent legitimite psychological reasoning either? If you want to contest the science, then provide something to make your case.

Thanks for making up some useless shit for us.

It's absurd to support the use of violence against the most vulnerable and impressionable humans within society if you oppose it in general. How can you expect children to take parents seriously in saying that violence against others is unacceptable, if they display it themselves against the...

It's a matter of what you should stop doing. Yes I can. Of all the statements made in NCAP, and particularly in a thread like this, why does that one need to be accompanied by evidence? Also, nice trolling.

A problem created almost entirely by other men.

It's not up to him to teach her a lesson. He isn't a parental figure or the legal system.

No. He should do whatever it takes, and no more, to defend himself. Retaliatory violence is best left to six year olds and the Middle East.

Stop attempting to discuss political matters at all ever, you're embarrassing yourself. In answer to the question, I don't accept that there is a widespread movement of "feminists" that actively promote hatred of men. This idea is primarily the paranoid, entirely inaccurate interpretation of...

Exactly. Germaine Greer has discussed this point in detail. When societal constructs such as the corporate environment have been primarily, or entirely shaped by men, for men, simply allocating women positions within this framework achieves nothing. Women are perfectly capable of choosing...

Nah I wear 29-30. With my frame if I needed 32's I would be overweight.

...what are you even saying? Honestly, you are one of the stupidest posters in NCAP ever.

Your friends are mistaken.

Do you get sick of being wrong all the time? The adverse health effects of soy products have been very greatly overstated, with huge support from the dairy industry.

I agree with everything except the last statement. It can never be too philosophical.

"Because God" is not a useful answer. You just happen to take it one step further than that and say "Because my glaringly improbable conception of God arising from unreliable, self-contradictory dogma"

Theists don't even acknowledge these questions, let alone answer them. Philosophy, particularly epistemology, is where the collapse of the foundation of monotheistic religion is most evident.

It's alright, they really fucking ruin it in the middle though with the two terrible slow acoustic tracks. Careful, Brick by boring brick and Turn it off are the best songs.

Stop posting immediately.

Stopped reading here.

Not if the belief is based on a combination of epistemological concepts and physical evidence. Faith essentially just means belief without evidence.