Search results

Uhh, I'd hate to break it to you, but yes they can.

Re: I screwed up my half yearlies What about the motor effect? Faraday's law?

ditto.

There have been cases in the HSC where people decided to only study a select few poems and when they were asked to comment on a poem that they decided not to study in their own wisdom, they were disadvantaged.

Yeah I've got that Coroneos one that goes back to 1990. I also borrowed my teacher's MANSW blue book that had solutions from 1986-1989 I think and copied the 1989 ones. I think Coroneos also has ones that go back until 1967, but I don't think there any purpose in buying that as the only useful...

Oh and Mr Choi, seeing as I wont be reading this thread any longer say what pleases yourself now because I really cbf to reply to your stupid arguments. If you have anything more to say (that you actually want me to read) then me PM me. I'm not going to further flood these boards with your...

:S Okay... because your opinion of me matters so much that I'm so desperate to seek your approval, and because you're the ultimate judge who categorises who is obnoxious and arrogant.

Since you cannot let this die down, I guess I'll address your points. So you're saying that selective schools have the easiest trials??? lmao. You do realise that in any school they try to make it so that you get a decent spread. ie. no point in having a test that everybody will do really well...

The Coroneos 4U supplement is pretty decent IMO. The font however put some people off. But a solid book :)

No need to patronise me :( As for your question:

Hmm takers for part (ii) and (iii)? I think I kinda got (ii) but not too sure. I don't really wanna post my 'scraps' of working up here when I don't know that it's correct, and it's messy too :(

Uhh, Terry Lee isn't that good for Mechanics either.

The Coroneos 4U supplement. But people say that Patel is good too, I still think Coroneos is better though. But it's easier that way and you'd be wasting time if you did it the long way and the question didn't ask for it. You could... But F=0 only applies when there is no sideways frictional...

If you were going to do to it properly, here's how. Resolve forces by drawing the appropriate vector diagrams... Then: Resolving forces down plane: mv^2/r * cosθ = F + mgsinθ For no sideways slipping F=0 So mv^2/r* cosθ= mgsinθ So tanθ = v^2/rg So then sub values in etc. Or you could...

Well geez, thanks for calling me a troll when I was trying to help you! :mad: And secondly, Cambridge is a pile of crap for mechanics. And thirdly, you should have a sideways frictional force in your working, incase the question asks you to work it out. But nevermind that, I aint going to be...

Yeah I realised what I had to do. *Hits self on head* I'll try part (ii) later. But now I need some sleep. Oh if anyone wants to have a go at part (ii) then that'd also be appreciated :).

???

Umm, isn't that a theorem? Lengths of transversal trisected by a family of parallel lines are in the same ratio... or words to this effect. The last time I did this was nearly a year and a half ago, so I may've gotten some of the wording wrong.

Hey guys, I have no idea on where to start for this one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

Why would you want that book? It's a pile of crap sometimes. It blabs on too much in my opinion.