Search results

Well it's defined to be that way. It's the formal definition of complex numbers, one can't use sqrt(-1) = i to define the complex numbers. Definition (complex numbers) a complex number is a pair of real numbers (a,b). We Define the following for complex numbers: 1.) (a,b) @ (c,d) = (a+c,b+d)...

It's more of a generator...

I know this is late: http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Content/Chapters/AboutCERN/CERNFuture/CERNFuture-en.html

Keeps them employed. http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Content/Chapters/AboutCERN/WhyStudyPrtcles/WhyStudyPrtcles-en.html

for: 2w1 + 3iw2 = 0 (1-i)w1 + 2w2 = i-7 not really, lottox's way is quite short already.. he just made it long to explain it x^2-3x+10i=0 the hard part is to take the squareroot of 9-40i which after some thoughts gives you sqrt(9-40i) = (5-4i) or (-5+4i) (well you want to solve a^2 - b^2 = 9...

hello please feel free to answer one or more of my questions 1. Internal assessments matter more when the difference within the class is big. 2. Get use to it, whinging doesn't get you infront 3. Ditto. thats about all of my rambling thanxx and write anything peace out

If it aint broke don't fix it. And remember EU's seeds were sowed in a war, or a few wars

Depends on what you do I guess.. Mac's are chic though

Good enough. You'll get your UAI soon anyway.

It's when the bank invests in you

He has one I think.. and it's not quite the type of formula book he's looking for :P

No way.. you're an idiot brogan .. UWS is worse than harvard, TAFE is better though

I am impressed :P strictly my opinion: Well depends on how rich you are already.. coz if you aren't that rich, your best bet at getting rich will be creating/designing something new. In fact I think neither is optimal in this case, since both trains you to repeat well established procedures...

oops.. I am old

During winters it would usually be around -5, so umm.. you would need some thick clothing. It's very dry in the winter, and sometimes you get dust blown from the deserts to the west.

Well now we'll never know, it's a mere conjecture :P

V = int(pi*x^2 dy, y=-6..6) = int(pi*(y^2 - 6)^2 dy, y=-6..6) = you can do this part

I got a feeling that this optimization problem is infeasible. have you looked at the formula books in the library? The thing is, it's not gonna be that common for probability theory to be in the same book as numerical methods, and for any book which does, it would probably have alot more...

yes.

Maybe your impression will change if you did some real mathematics.