Search results

Someone please scan the paper and upload it. And ajay i'd already looked the 2006 question up but i had no idea what our question was so I needed someone with the test to adjudicate

Executed with grace, and dignity. Also, this is how I did that real GDP question, Q12: GDP -- CPI 6000 - 130 6800 - 150 So 6000 x (150/130) [so as to get it to the 150 level of CPI] equals 6923.xx, and since thats greater than 6800, then 6800 represents a lower real GDP in Year 2...

Hopefully they will realise that I am actually done with English and posted that in the hope that future years don't have to suffer through it. And I'm not complaining because I went poorly, I didn't. Its more to do with the fact that I went through a year of memorising essays, reading only...

For those people interested in the multiplier question, it was something like this: Y ------ C 400 | 150 500 | 200 600 | 250 ??? | 350 Each year the level of consumption rose by 50, and the level of national income rose by 100. Then in the last year, when C rose by 100, you get the answer of...

2006, Q3 has a very similar question on Real GDP. Can someone please look it up to stop this bickering. The answer to the 2006 question is B, so I think that means the answer for today is that it decreases.

I cant even remember writing a positive aspect of inflation, must've glazed over whilst writing it.

questions please. someone post them, that is

Oh it was a very uneducated guess, just based on what I felt today was like. Top 15% get band 6 in eco from memory. Surely top 15% would get 85+

Stop fucking asserting your "right" answers unless the question is posted and explained.

Im thinking maybe 88 for todays. It was shit easy

Someone should post up the multiple choice questions, I have no idea what you guys are referring to.

no idea, what has it been in the past?

Please, Board of Studies, take notice of this thread. The entire original article by the English teacher describes exactly what we are all feeling. English, right now, is terrible. It needs a complete workover. Also, some more points raised which I completely agree with: Over analysis of...

Minor mistakes in Paper 1 and 3U maths, stupid lack of studying for 4U, majorly fucked legal which was surprising considering i was ranked well. Legal could be a terribly average mark. And I just killed eco, I mean really killed it. Fkn fantastic way to finish

Yep, same here. And if anyone here from the Board reads this, don't get the mistaken impression that we are just a vocal minority and use that to cloud your judgement - this is a terriblly unjust and unprofessional decision if it is indeed true.

A long term problem such as an injured hand? I dont see any other problems that might limit your writing that would give a valid excuse for special provisions

it did seem a bit....unlike them

This is gonna look terrible for the Board if they actually cave into this. Though they may use the excuse that they 'need sufficient numbers to fill the top band' or something like that, on face value they are just marking our essays based on a different question to the one they gave us.

Special provisions always feel like cheating to me, and should only be for people who have actually injured their hand. That's the only 'condition' which would realistically limit their writing speed from what they can normally do. Did this actually happen? I'm pretty sure I know who it is.

That mentality will never work on the internet unfortunately. So do most atheists here believe that Christians force their beliefs onto others? Is this why Christians suffer such an online backlash? I am also slightly bemused as to why this happens...