Search results

So you've admitted science is limited? Wouldn't it be logical to assume that something supernatural initiated the creation of the universe? Using the laws of the universe "Matter can neither be created nor destroyed". Take, for example, a book lying on a table. The book is not going to move...

A booklet for each of them? That's quite incredible (assuming you filled an 8 pg booklet). Perhaps a bit of overkill there. I wrote 2 for 6 marks 4 pages for 8 marks and 3 for 7 marks. And I thought I may have overdone it...

Ever heard of Lourdes? Lourdes Medical Bureau - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is just one of many. I can list billions off to you. I'd also be interested to see what atheists believe initiated the creation of the universe. I know they'll rattle off something about the bing bang theory...

How do you know nothing supernatural exists? And the being that created the physical laws of the universe can defy them. Makes perfect sense.

I know. It felt weird/disconcerting coming out being a little unsure about some questions. Then I came home and spent a bit of time working the later/harder questions out, and it was fortunately all good.

Difficult 3u exam. I think I JUST managed not to drop any marks.

Why does only the natural world or the supernatural world have to exist? Why can they not coexist? Science was constructed to categorise the natural. It is for this reason that science cannot explain religion, as religion is of the supernatural and thus cannot be categorised. And it is a very...

If it is such a figment, my friend, then why are there all those miraculous, supernatural occurences that have happened throughout history? Secondly, Christianity, and religion for that matter, has too big a following to be classified as a 'cult'.

There are two types of atheists: attention seekers claiming to be revolutionaries, and those who are angry at God. 95% of you would fall into the former.

The only reason you are saying this is because science cannot explain religion. Science categorises the natural, whereas religion is of the supernatural. Would that not therefore suggest that science is limited? Perhaps the atheists are the ignorant ones for trying to view the limitless through...

Well I dunno, that's what appeared on my screen when I checked last December. I know I didn't get a state ranking, but these are what appeared.

Yeh, the nemini I mucked up. Out of curiosity, how much did everyone write for the commentary questions? I know I tried to keep it concise with plenty of analysis. But I'm not completely sure of the length they expect for the commentaries, particularly the 7/8 mark ones.

I was tossing both of those over for a while. I initially thought possession, but discarded that for agent I think. But now looking back it really doesn't seem like agent at all. I'm still surprised that temporal wasn't an option with the 'quaererent'. Did anyone find the structure of the...

Also, how many are sitting the extension paper?

Commentary was v-good. Seens should be all good (I looked over the (b) virgil seen 5 mins before the exam, which was fortunate). Grammar unsure about a couple, but not bad overall. Messed up the unseens a bit though. Only left 30 mins for it, and they both didn't come out as 'cleanly' as I would...

Got it all out. Terry Lee solutions agree with everything I had, so that's encouraging. Hopefully full marks. But, suppose we'll just have to wait and see...

i thought the paper was a whole new level above the '08 paper, and incomparable with '07. I thought this year's was fairly long, and every question (bar qu 2 perhaps) had difficult parts. The difficult questions were evenly spread throught the paper. The last three qu's were quiet challenging...

No thank you. Firstly I'm doing physics next yr, and secondly I prefer to earn my marks.

Generally around. Guys in my year level and friends from other schools ask me if I've heard about it and if it's true. I have no idea, so I thought I'd ask people here. Everyone here seems to have their finger on the pulse.

I've heard rumours that the Physics paper has been leaked out. Can anyone confirm/deny this???