Lolsmith
kill all boomers
Re: Rape! It's ok if you're a Muslim!
ITT: the reason why this country is basically a police state
ITT: the reason why this country is basically a police state
Im guessing no one knows of the many paedophile who havnt been sent to jail because of their freaking smart ass lawyers. I feel sorry for humanity. DO you HONESTLY believe that Islam says you can rape women? Are you mental? your sense of logic must be so low. Everyone has a right to appeal, I agree with that. But for this appeal, there are soooo any factors to consider. Like what is "cultural difference"? Does that mean his culture, as in his AFGHAN culture? Is it the culture that the has has adapted in Australia? Is it the culture/way of his parents/family? Is it the media culture pressured on him? Is it the social culture? Don't just make the assumption and judgement that its cause of his religion. All the media will say is "cultural difference" and the rest is up to you to assume. And its funny how his religion is the first thing that comes to peoples mind. What if he was Christian, or atheist, or Hindu? Would you then make the same assumption? Seriously people grow some brains. Im not a Muslim, But I hate the fact that the media is bashing on them.
actually, the issue here is that he is an afghan muslimPeace. The issue here isn't the fact that he is a Muslim. It's the fact that he's a fucking retard.
must be those same feminists who have conveniently missed every single rape in Norway and Swden in the past decadeFeminists in can't know everything and can't be everywhere at once scandal
Brother, I agree with you that he is fucking retarded. But what's with the posts name? Why is he constantly named the "Muslim man" if that's not the issue? I was so drawn in by that. Why couldn't it be "man allowed to appeal for rape"? Im 100% sure other people have appeal for rape as well. But there is an exception to this man, its because of his "cultural difference" which people assume to be the fact that he is Muslim... That's fucking retarded all together. And yes the legal system is pretty crooked, No one should be allowed to appeal for rape. But that would infringe their rights.Peace. The issue here isn't the fact that he is a Muslim. It's the fact that he's a fucking retard.
Point to one that involved "not understanding consent due to cultural reasons". ONE.Im 100% sure other people have appeal for rape as well.
He's not being convicted of being an Afghan Muslim. He is not appealing on the basis that he is an Afghan Muslim, he is appealing on the basis that his cultural/linguistic differences have acted as a barrier. As a previous poster has posted, rape is not encouraged in Muslim law - thanks to the shitty stigma of Islamists, most people will assume it is encouraged. So no, the issue here is not that he is an Afghan muslim.actually, the issue here is that he is an afghan muslim
Unfortunately that is just how the world is.Brother, I agree with you that he is fucking retarded. But what's with the posts name? Why is he constantly named the "Muslim man" if that's not the issue? I was so drawn in by that. Why couldn't it be "man allowed to appeal for rape"? Im 100% sure other people have appeal for rape as well. But there is an exception to this man, its because of his "cultural difference" which people assume to be the fact that he is Muslim... That's fucking retarded all together. And yes the legal system is pretty crooked, No one should be allowed to appeal for rape. But that would infringe their rights.
Before I do that can you define "cultural reasons" for me? And I mean the definition that the judge has given in the judgement of this case, not from some random dictionary.Point to one that involved "not understanding consent due to cultural reasons". ONE.
must be those same feminists who have conveniently missed every single rape in Norway and Swden in the past decade
Before I do that can you define "cultural reasons" for me? And I mean the definition that the judge has given in the judgement of this case, not from some random dictionary.
Then I will give you one that involved cultural reasoning. Because Im not racist, I don't make the assumption that cultural reasoning means his religion. Look at the facts of the case.
"The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Sharifi) didn't have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations."
"In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had "an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships" in Australia."
However as Kiraken has previously posted, based on reports (which are generally unreliable lol) it seems to be an issue of consent. However this consent is messed up because of the defendant's retarded "cultural misconceptions"
The only reason we know this happened is because of the media though. I think what you actually want is for the media not to report on bad things that minorities do.Don't listen to the media.
Look at how women in Muslim countries don't really have a lot of power regarding sexual rights though. Different groups believe different things. You can't make the claim that his behavior wasn't influenced by the culture he was seeped in. When are they seperate?That is, an issue of consent in sexual assault, where ISLAM IS COMPLETELY OUT OF THE QUESTION.
The only reason we know this happened is because of the media though. I think what you actually want is for the media not to report on bad things that minorities do.
Look at how women in Muslim countries don't really have a lot of power regarding sexual rights though. Different groups believe different things. You can't make the claim that his behavior wasn't influenced by the culture he was seeped in. When are they seperate?
Yes I have to agree with this. Can an admin please change the title of the post because quite frankly the title is rather ostracising.Originally Posted by loversinjapan
"The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Sharifi) didn't have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations."
"In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had "an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships" in Australia."
However as Kiraken has previously posted, based on reports (which are generally unreliable lol) it seems to be an issue of consent. However this consent is messed up because of the defendant's retarded "cultural misconceptions"
Thank you for that Loverinjapan. Although it was a question posed to SylviaB. SylviaB it seems that you have completely misunderstood the whole case and concept. The case has therefore nothing to do with his religion. Yet I find it quite amusing as your title for this forum assumes a discussion about Muslims being allowed to rape... Such is life comprised of humans unable to think freely. Don't listen to the media.
Henceforth, SylviaB I strongly reccomend that you review these "unreliable sources" and even though unreliable, try to understand the concepts and legal issues behind it. That is, an issue of consent in sexual assault, where ISLAM IS COMPLETELY OUT OF THE QUESTION.
Have a good day
+1, that sort of culture should not be imposed here.Personally, I don't give a fuck where you come from, what religion you are or what culture you grew up in. The fact that you're in Australia means that you follow Australian laws - what's 100% unacceptable here should be punished appropriately. If you come to Australia and want to keep gross "culture", go back to where ever you came from where it is acceptable.