Yeah that is what i meant.Im not sure what you mean lol, is everyone through the same distance school is seen as one cohort? yeah
Must be hard to rank first.
Yeah that is what i meant.Im not sure what you mean lol, is everyone through the same distance school is seen as one cohort? yeah
I think the only hard bit is not having anyone to learn with i guess. Like, people at normal schools would have a class as like a support network lolYeah that is what i meant.
Must be hard to rank first.
Yeah, even withmy smallest class (Economics with 10 people) it makes it so much easier with othersI think the only hard bit is not having anyone to learn with i guess. Like, people at normal schools would have a class as like a support network lol
This is not true. I was doing MX1 through Sydney Distance Ed where I came first internally. And I was NOT ranked against students at other distance education schools because different schools made totally different assessment tasks.Nah, we are ranked against the other distance students. But, through dubbo distance ed, I am the only one enrolled in MX2 (and MX1 for that matter lol)
Well it is true for me, because dubbo distance ed sets/gives the same assessment tasks to their studentsThis is not true. I was doing MX1 through Sydney Distance Ed where I came first internally. And I was NOT ranked against students at other distance education schools because different schools made totally different assessment tasks.
I'm guessing in that year so many people bombed out because there was lots of harder 3U, but then again there were like 3-4 olympiad students that year, so I guess they made that exam to distinguish those 3-4 ppl. Although on the other hand they didn't make it as hard as the SBHS 2002 trial paperDid the 2008 paper --> 72/120----> FML, mebbe i oughta let that spider bite me...
Yeah there were a lot of 3U stuff, I got everything but the stupid circle geoI'm guessing in that year so many people bombed out because there was lots of harder 3U, but then again there were like 3-4 olympiad students that year, so I guess they made that exam to distinguish those 3-4 ppl. Although on the other hand they didn't make it as hard as the SBHS 2002 trial paper
Do you mean the same assessment tasks as the ones at other Distance Ed High Schools? If so, does it imply that students at all Catholic schools in the state which use CSSA exams are ranked against each other?Well it is true for me, because dubbo distance ed sets/gives the same assessment tasks to their students
Yes, I did.That makes more sense...so by your sig you accelerated MX1 through distant ed?
I got most of harder 3U. I got the 1st part of the circle geo. but the 2nd part, WTF?Yeah there were a lot of 3U stuff, I got everything but the stupid circle geo
haha that question was weird as hell. it was liked doing the challenge questions in at the back of the exam in year 8 or 9.I got most of harder 3U. I got the 1st part of the circle geo. but the 2nd part, WTF?
Nice, that would have gotten you 97 or more I reckon, since the amount of harder 3U put a lot of people off. I got 115 lost 2 in that stupid circle geo because I forgot how the secant rule works were tangent = something x something.q8 in the 2010 paper was so good lol i love integration
first 4u exam i've cracked 100 in
got 101 for that one. not an easy paper imo.q8 in the 2010 paper was so good lol i love integration
first 4u exam i've cracked 100 in
yeah i would not have liked that paper myself. i found the early questions in that paper off putting.got 101 for that one. not an easy paper imo.
The probability and the inequalities question were like WTF =_=yeah i would not have liked that paper myself. i found the early questions in that paper off putting.