Shadowdude
Cult of Personality
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,145
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2010
m8 i'm not the christian know-it-all so go ask a priest about it and they'll probably explain all of that*Incorrect buzzer noise*
Paul of Tarsus said that the teachings of the Torah were covered by Christ and all that shit.
But he's the same guy that was for women in the Church and then wrote "let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for women to speak in the Church" in Corinthians.
Hi person with the exact same point I made like 10 pages agoi still don't get this debate. do i support gays/lesbians getting full recognition, tax benefits and the other legal benefits of being married? yes.
however, i don't support it being called a 'marriage'. the simple fact is that marriage has been the term that has denoted a bond between a man and a woman for thousands of years. as much as i think religious people are bat shit insane, the word marriage has large religious connotations and a lot of tradition to it. if you gave gays/lesbians all of the rights i mentioned above, yet just called it a 'civil union' or whatever, what's the difference? i don't go around and whinge that i can't be classified as a negro, it's because i'm not, i don't fit the definition.
/me facepalmsuuughmg, such a pointless thread.
yes, they should be allowed - there are not valid arguments for those who are religious
gays receive far too much attention - IMPORTANT TO REALISE THIS
gays should not be allowed to have children
it should not be called marriage, but rather something else
marriage is religious - however the term has been corrupted by those choosing not to use a priest or church
there are gay protestant pastors (fucking stupid)
most against say they hate gay men but love lesbian porn
there are more important issues
/thread
lolYeah, I'm pretty convinced lonelywolf is a homo (posts in the attractive male thread a lot)