Funky Monk
Member
Re: Libya part 2
...
...
best [blurst] trollwho CARES if the rebels are crushed. just because they are fighting against someone who you think is bad doesn't automatically make them good.
Enforcing a no fly zone and supplying the rebels with material is very different from invading a nation unilaterally on spurious grounds.You would like to see the international community intervene and chase him out? You?
almost every video I've seen of the rebels fighting has been permeated with cries of "allahu akbar"best [blurst] troll
Much of the videos I've seen have been of protestors/rebels stating that they have had enough of oppression under Gaddafi and want some right to self-determination.almost every video I've seen of the rebels fighting has been permeated with cries of "allahu akbar"
and the West is like
"lets support them and put them in power because they are moral gods magnitudes better than gaddafi and his people!"
they're furious muslims who now know violence and have tasted their first blood.
we need a country run by these people
yes.
There are a lot of energy benefits from helping them liberate Libya.why do we want them to destroy gadaffi though
what the hell do we get out of it
itll be at the least a pain in the arse if his regime goes down for us
his replacement isnt going to be any better
yes all change is good.Much of the videos I've seen have been of protestors/rebels stating that they have had enough of oppression under Gaddafi and want some right to self-determination.
Also you roll the rebel movement into a singular "they", when as far as I'm aware it's a collective assorted people and groups with a like-minded will for change.
But in a more ideal world this "support" wouldn't be somehow given through some sort of private enterprise as opposed to the UN/armies of national governments, funded by taxation?Enforcing a no fly zone and supplying the rebels with material is very different from invading a nation unilaterally on spurious grounds.
They have asked for our help, we are obliged to help.
US/UN/etc forces will not sack Tripoli and bring out Gaddafi. They will arm the protestors and defend them if need be.
Expansion: people are dying in the fight to overthrow a dictator, this is the purest cause of liberty in the world, supporting it does not contain any ideological conflict. In a more ideal world there'd be no tyrants or governments.But in a more ideal world this "support" wouldn't be somehow given through some sort of private enterprise as opposed to the UN/armies of national governments, funded by taxation?
Relativity dictates this is true but it doesn't invalidate my question. In an ideal world there would be nothing to kill or die for but in a more ideal world than the one we currently live there could be dictators and tyrants and bears. Oh my!. In a more ideal world there'd be no tyrants or governments.
Needless to say, it stuns me to be on this side of the fence regarding intervention. There are millions of us around the world if given the chance would take up arms in support of our libyan brothers and sisters, regardless of governmental intervention or no.Relativity dictates this is true but it doesn't invalidate my question. In an ideal world there would be nothing to kill or die for but in a more ideal world than the one we currently live there could be dictators and tyrants and bears. Oh my!