That there is your problem.shinji said:i was all prepared
i really don't think the exam suited those who did lots of study, as most of it seemed to be general sort of flowery whoever can write the most elegant computer sounding crap. i would've prefered if it had favoured those who memorized the syllabus and textbook more, but thats probably just me. our class totally picked the definitions for TPS though, was very satisfying seeing transaction (i think) come up after we had predicted it.Bijs said:That there is your problem.
yea, i was really unimpressed with the test paper because people that actually knew things couldn't be separated from people that didn't, since half the test was just rambling and making it up as you go.meowmaine said:i really don't think the exam suited those who did lots of study, as most of it seemed to be general sort of flowery whoever can write the most elegant computer sounding crap. i would've prefered if it had favoured those who memorized the syllabus and textbook more, but thats probably just me. our class totally picked the definitions for TPS though, was very satisfying seeing transaction (i think) come up after we had predicted it.
gaoOO said:yea, i was really unimpressed with the test paper because people that actually knew things couldn't be separated from people that didn't, since half the test was just rambling and making it up as you go.
the problem was that even though rote learning didn't help for this test, actual knowledge didn't either. so those that learnt everything had little advantage over those that learnt nothing. bad balance.meowmaine said:in any sense i am told this is a trend in the HSC, moving away from rope learning to more "creative" tests, which is really frustrating for someone like me.