torrentperson
Member
This is a characteristic of politics in general, on both left and right. Party politicians are the ultimate partisans, and it suits their purpose to claim that the other side is dangerous. History suggests they don't actually think it. After Keating won the 1994 election, he called Hewson and told him that, despite full-throated criticism of him in the campaign as a Scrooge, indeed a "feral abacus", he actually admired him a great deal. Likewise, we expect Rudd to say Howard has done "great damage" to the nation, and for Howard to imply that Labor would drive the economy of a cliff if it were put behind the wheel; but both men are too clever to genuinely think something so crude._dhj_ said:Why don't you ask the expert on who breeds hysteria and the circumstances in which they breed. Seriously Howard is a genius. Conservative governments around the world take lessons from his spin-doctors.
Next time you reply, rather than clumsily evading the question, please explain why you think Howard is evil, and also why people who disagree with your political views can't simply be wrong, but must also be malevolent and sinister.