Timesplitter 01
Lord Timesplitter
1:1 is correct
Intangablies are assets , but they are non current. I should know , I did accounting at Tafe in year 11 and this year
Oh by the way cro angel , you want it to be either 2:1 or more ( eg 3:1) because then you have a lot more Current Assets than Current Liablities.
If you look in the excel book , the general rule of thumb is 2:1 , but its better for the business to have more.
I think you are getting your self confused with the solvency ratio.
Superbird is right in one sense that even though it is good to have a 1:1 ratio , its to low and therefore high risk. But its better than having a ratio of 0.8: 1.
You would really have to increase cashflow and decrease the current liablities ( and that was one of the parts you to do in that question , where you had to analyse
Intangablies are assets , but they are non current. I should know , I did accounting at Tafe in year 11 and this year
Oh by the way cro angel , you want it to be either 2:1 or more ( eg 3:1) because then you have a lot more Current Assets than Current Liablities.
If you look in the excel book , the general rule of thumb is 2:1 , but its better for the business to have more.
I think you are getting your self confused with the solvency ratio.
Superbird is right in one sense that even though it is good to have a 1:1 ratio , its to low and therefore high risk. But its better than having a ratio of 0.8: 1.
You would really have to increase cashflow and decrease the current liablities ( and that was one of the parts you to do in that question , where you had to analyse
Last edited: