Mercury:
Okay Shannon, I apologise... maybe I was in the heat of debate and I lost control... erhem... It's just that High, I believe, is the most unique in those respects, than all the other public schools. Sure Ruse et alia has chess, ISCF, cadetship et cetera, but it does not incorporate them into its ethos, as High does. We are TAUGHT to be all-rounders. I am not a JR-basher, it's not tall-poppy syndrome, and you know that Shaz. Look at my previous posts and my overall argument; I am defending my school's honour.
I respect and admire JR people, you know that. I am friends with you, and many others at JR. You guys make sure the HSC is not ruled by those who've had an expensive education; you guys form the academic standard we look up to.
Anyway, stuff Valentine's Day (*goddamn commercial gimmick*). They have roses for sale at SGHS too! (though the chances of me buying/getting a rose this year are impossible).
Someone buy me a rose? @K-'-,--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobo123:
I know you don't want a reply, but I feel like it
Question One:
A school is made up of individuals, each with their own strength and weaknesses... Of course some people are going to be stronger at Maths, but that DOES NOT, SHOULD NOT, and CANNOT mean they do not know how "to speak english". In fact some mathematically talented are also excellent English students (O.W.), chess players (C.Q.) and basketball players (D.L.). It is, by a chemistry analogy, like a pH scale... High tries, with its ethos, to make all of us be pH 6-8, so there is room for individual pursuit, but also the strength for all-rounding ability.
No one would rather not want the whole package (academic/sporting/cultural/prefectship), but nobody is perfect. How could you have the audacity to suggest my school is a divided, when, in fact, the High family is very united.
If you wish to discuss this matter further, I suggest you talk to my principal, Dr. K. Jaggar on (02) 9361 6910 and I'm sure he will correct you.
Question Two:
Yes, in Year 6, I did put down JR as top choice. So what?...
Unfortunately, I was in a reserve 'C' position, and I declined my application. But then, I was young and inexperienced, so I believe that only JR would produce the best academic results.
But then again, is it just about the results?
How about the overall development of a young man, from year 7 to year 12?
I do not regret for a moment entering High, because I love the place, every part of it: its traditions, its location, its merits. Maybe in the end, I will get 0.05 UAI lower, but I rather be an all-rounder than just be a good HSC candidate.
Just because I did put JR as top choice, when I was ignorant of both schools, does not waiver my loyalty to my school. Bobo, you are dirtying the argument by suggesting that. JR might have the best HSC results, but it does not mean High is not a great school.
Your argument, surely, does not dampen our school spirit, especially as seen by the vehement retorts from High expressed in this thread.
Veritate et Virtute...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shoutoutz to pigs (Opz 4 M.T.), Mercury (ex SGHS, now JR), phenol (Geo is a chem master), Suvat (has got his Ps) and kaboomable (soloHX), marsenal (???another High Boy) et alia (from the Sydney High Schools).
Frigid out.
Okay Shannon, I apologise... maybe I was in the heat of debate and I lost control... erhem... It's just that High, I believe, is the most unique in those respects, than all the other public schools. Sure Ruse et alia has chess, ISCF, cadetship et cetera, but it does not incorporate them into its ethos, as High does. We are TAUGHT to be all-rounders. I am not a JR-basher, it's not tall-poppy syndrome, and you know that Shaz. Look at my previous posts and my overall argument; I am defending my school's honour.
I respect and admire JR people, you know that. I am friends with you, and many others at JR. You guys make sure the HSC is not ruled by those who've had an expensive education; you guys form the academic standard we look up to.
Anyway, stuff Valentine's Day (*goddamn commercial gimmick*). They have roses for sale at SGHS too! (though the chances of me buying/getting a rose this year are impossible).
Someone buy me a rose? @K-'-,--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobo123:
I know you don't want a reply, but I feel like it
Question One:
I HONESTLY think my school is full of all-rounders... There is no division between the nerds and the jocks, the uncool and the cool, but think about this logically...Do you HONESTLY think that your grade is composed of all rounders (acadamic/sport/social) or is there a sort of rift that divides the nerds and the jocks?
A school is made up of individuals, each with their own strength and weaknesses... Of course some people are going to be stronger at Maths, but that DOES NOT, SHOULD NOT, and CANNOT mean they do not know how "to speak english". In fact some mathematically talented are also excellent English students (O.W.), chess players (C.Q.) and basketball players (D.L.). It is, by a chemistry analogy, like a pH scale... High tries, with its ethos, to make all of us be pH 6-8, so there is room for individual pursuit, but also the strength for all-rounding ability.
No one would rather not want the whole package (academic/sporting/cultural/prefectship), but nobody is perfect. How could you have the audacity to suggest my school is a divided, when, in fact, the High family is very united.
If you wish to discuss this matter further, I suggest you talk to my principal, Dr. K. Jaggar on (02) 9361 6910 and I'm sure he will correct you.
Question Two:
Now, bobo - mate, that's just dirtying this argument... what my parents or I put down in the applications, or what we/I thought is personal and irrelevant to this debate. But since you yourself wishes that I think about it, I shall do you the honour of letting you know what's on my mind.Disregarding all other aspects (location,etc), would you have preferred to go to James Ruse in year 7?
Yes, in Year 6, I did put down JR as top choice. So what?...
Unfortunately, I was in a reserve 'C' position, and I declined my application. But then, I was young and inexperienced, so I believe that only JR would produce the best academic results.
But then again, is it just about the results?
How about the overall development of a young man, from year 7 to year 12?
I do not regret for a moment entering High, because I love the place, every part of it: its traditions, its location, its merits. Maybe in the end, I will get 0.05 UAI lower, but I rather be an all-rounder than just be a good HSC candidate.
Just because I did put JR as top choice, when I was ignorant of both schools, does not waiver my loyalty to my school. Bobo, you are dirtying the argument by suggesting that. JR might have the best HSC results, but it does not mean High is not a great school.
Your argument, surely, does not dampen our school spirit, especially as seen by the vehement retorts from High expressed in this thread.
Veritate et Virtute...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shoutoutz to pigs (Opz 4 M.T.), Mercury (ex SGHS, now JR), phenol (Geo is a chem master), Suvat (has got his Ps) and kaboomable (soloHX), marsenal (???another High Boy) et alia (from the Sydney High Schools).
Frigid out.
Last edited: