This guy.prole said:Your all retarted. It was a human. Shut the fuck up.
well i dont share your point of veiw, i suppose when the notes from the marking centre come out all will be revealed.nirvanafreak02 said:if you didn't know what an extended metaphor was then i would question what you've been doing in school for the past 6 years
tom.... case in point - in our half yearlies we were asked what the "a factor" was, and everyone that interpreted it wrong did not get full marks no matter how well you supported you claim
it's a 3 mark question, if you thought it was a dog but supported your argument you will get 2 for techniques and 0 for "what reflections"
Don't know if this was directed at me or just in general, but if so i already said that i used that in my answer.nirvanafreak02 said:if you didn't know what an extended metaphor was then i would question what you've been doing in school for the past 6 years"
share my view on the marking thing?-may-cat- said:well i dont share your point of veiw, i suppose when the notes from the marking centre come out all will be revealed.
it was not directed at you.TomTomtruck said:Don't know if this was directed at me or just in general, but if so i already said that i used that in my answer.
So yeah i know what it is, i wasn't just guessing.
nah it was a general statementTomTomtruck said:Don't know if this was directed at me or just in general, but if so i already said that i used that in my answer.
So yeah i know what it is, i wasn't just guessing.
you do not mark hsc. i do not agree with you, that is it.nirvanafreak02 said:share my view on the marking thing?
it's not really my view, it's just how it's done... as soon as you say dog you're already in the mediocore pile (for that question). it's the sad fact of the hsc,
you were told about how to answer a specific question before the exam what now?nirvanafreak02 said:no but i know how the hsc is marked because my teachers mark it, this is what we were told before and after the exam.... if you didn't say it was a dog then it shouldnt affect you anyway, but like i said it's just 3 marks
Oh i see, but i still think its too situational to compare, but to each his own.nirvanafreak02 said:i was referring to "a factor" in the text that we used.... there was some explanation of it in the text
i can't remember what i wrote, but i was implying a type of question ie comprehension ones-may-cat- said:you were told about how to answer a specific question before the exam what now?
EDIT- u no what fuck it, im not going to agree with you anyway.
agreed.TomTomtruck said:each his own.
No, they're not. The poem was not from a dog's perspective. It was from a human's perspective, who used the metaphor of being a dog in some brief parts to enhance how he perceived the new Darwin.-may-cat- said:Its not an essay, it does not require you to fully understand every aspect of the text, just the specific part it asks for. If the reflections are from a dogs point of veiw, but they are still damn good reflection responses, i see no reason why they shouldnt get full marks. Texts can be interpreted very differently, people are still arguing about shit like this with hamlet.