oh bull shit same logic, theres a difference between being on the plane and being moved on the planeShould all people who are of the Islamic faith not be allowed to fly (as the 9/11 terrorists were Islamic etc) by the same logic then?
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
oh bull shit same logic, theres a difference between being on the plane and being moved on the planeShould all people who are of the Islamic faith not be allowed to fly (as the 9/11 terrorists were Islamic etc) by the same logic then?
So should all men be banned from sitting next to women on a plane and forced to move?oh bull shit same logic, theres a difference between being on the plane and being moved on the plane
No, obviously there is a greater need to protect children, CHILDREN are more vulnerable than GROWN ADULT WOMEN, in this case.So should all men be banned from sitting next to women on a plane and forced to move?
More offenders are male than female, though the percentage varies between studies.
Do you mean vulnerable?No, obviously there is a greater need to protect children, CHILDREN are more venerable than GROWN ADULT WOMEN, in this case.
also....
It's not entirely bad logic, his point is that you are allowing for discrimination of the basis of a statistical correlation rather than any tangible causative link. There is no reason that I can see why you shouldn't ban black's or gays sitting next to children on planes if you're going to say men can't. Would that be acceptable to you?oh bull shit same logic, theres a difference between being on the plane and being moved on the plane
Most sexual assault upon children is done by someone they know (this is true of all sexual assault, at any age), a member of their family or a friend, by a huge margin, 'stranger danger' is basically a myth, it's almost always someone you know.also.... "More offenders are male than female, though the percentage varies between studies."
+1It's not entirely bad logic, his point is that you are allowing for discrimination of the basis of a statistical correlation rather than any tangible causative link. There is no reason that I can see why you shouldn't ban black's or gays sitting next to children on planes if you're going to say men can't. Would that be acceptable to you?
Then you should pay for double then....... dickheadTotally agree with this , if i was a parent i wouldnt want there to be even the minute chance that a pedophile would be sitting next to my child .
but their opposition (Qantas) is worse... soIts just plain bad logic, and all guys should boycott that airline, till they changed things
Beat me to it, and it's not just sexual assault of children. Aside from armed robbery violent crime in pretty much all it's manifestations normally occurs between close acquaintances not strangers, and yet people want more privacy. It's a strange world.Most sexual assault upon children is done by someone they know (this is true of all sexual assault, at any age), a member of their family or a friend, by a huge margin, 'stranger danger' is basically a myth, it's almost always someone you know.
They talk about 'stranger danger' in schools, because it's not politically correct to tell children the ones they really have to watch out for are their mums and dads, that wouldn't fly with the p&c.
Sitting next to stranger men is the safest place for children on planes.
Fuck it..... i guess its time to break lawsbut their opposition (Qantas) is worse... so
nurses can also be pedophiles.Is he he nurse guy? I read an article about a male nurse (also on Qantas I think) who was moved. Nurses have to undergo working with children checks every year.