If the student unions are so adamant that they provide essential services that are utilised by the majority of the student cohort, then why are they so sceptical about a decline in membership? If the majority of students out there gain some form of realistic benefit from paying their fees, then they will continue to do so...
Or wait, is it because everybody pays their union fees, however only a minority of students gain some tangible usage out of them...
Why should a part-time student, or a student who spends three hours a day, four days a week at the campus, spend somewhere between $360-$600 p.a on services and the like, that they gain absolutley no usage from and accrue no benefits from ...
...its about choice and being able to spend YOUR own money according to usage and the relative benefit..
Moreover, compulsory unionism was removed from the workplace in 1996, so what makes the university version any different...
It probably has something to do with the fact thatthe student unions are aware of the massive decline in both the membership and power of industry based unions across the country...