did you learn how to write and read aswell?akimoto said:why do u need a circumized :S ......thingy......... i tot only jews did that because of religious reasons..... well dass wad i learnt at school....
gliding action makes sex better and far more enjoyable. This is impossible without a foreskin. Does it highten stimulation? yes indeed the foreskin has a mass of nerve endings that greatly increase pleasure.agentprovocator said:ps. a sub question fellas, and my girlfriend wud like to kno...what do u guys do when u masturbate? do u guys first pull the skin back? or do u do it during mid stroke? does it heighten stimulation??
Smegma is no more or less disgusting than other body fluids like puss besides it has an actual purposeagentprovocator said:Anyway, my personal opinion is that a circumcised one probably looks better, and is less sensitive, and no crap can get inside(ewww the word smegma made me feel faint...thats gross dude)
As long as you bathe reguarly there is no reason for it to build up to visible levels. Washing with soap or over washing can be bad. Being circumcised to prevent the build up of smegma is almost as logical as amputating your foot to prevent sweaty and stinking feet. Simple washing prevents both problems.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma said:, lack of smegma could contribute to the loss of subpreputial wetness consisting of natural skin oils, leading to drying or chafing of the glans in circumcised men. Smegma can be removed by wiping or washing the genital area.
It's called lube.Serius said:gliding action makes sex better and far more enjoyable. This is impossible without a foreskin.
Some people can't pull back the foreskin to wash it - that's when, I think, you should have it done.As long as you bathe reguarly there is no reason for it to build up to visible levels. Washing with soap or over washing can be bad. Being circumcised to prevent the build up of smegma is almost as logical as amputating your foot to prevent sweaty and stinking feet. Simple washing prevents both problems.
Even if i was circumsised there would still be zero chance i would mutilate my son's genitals.
...?Its funny that so many circumsised guys are all for circumcision.
No, a lot of non-Jewish people get it done, especially in the US. It's just become a family tradition that was revived in the US, for whatever reason. I briefly looked online, but I couldn't find a reason/timeframe for when it became popular in the US - I don't know if it was brought with the first 16th C settlements, or if it was maybe brought later with the Puritans or later still.akimoto said:why do u need a circumized :S ......thingy......... i tot only jews did that because of religious reasons..... well dass wad i learnt at school....
Have a shower together and do it for him then. Easy?eagle21 said:oh i see... but i dont really know how to mention that to him.. i cant exactly blurt out that he should wash himself more! thatd embarass him so much!
Dude, did you even read the stuff which he posted up? Some of the research is quite valid. Maybe I'm missing something - can you explain what's wrong with the medical articles referred to?Anti-Mathmite said:Even if uncircumcised people did have a greater chance of developing cancer (which they don't),
Don't take an extreme hard line. Circumcision cannot be compared to cutting out someone's brain, possibly because cutting out a brain would kill you whereas circumcision does not?that's still no reason to cut it off. That like saying "babies who have their brains cut out at birth have a lesser chance of developing brain cancer.
Clearly a reliable, unbiased source...
Oh my, 'cheers' is an Australian saying?! I thought Ted Danson and all of them were quite American... I must be confused about the whole American people in the American bar thing... :/Do you know that when you say "Cheers", it's customary to clunk two quantities of Alcohol together. So you can't use this Australian saying because you can't drink booze.
and yet a lot of ppl do it.dieburndie said:To me it's kinda obvious that circumcision is an unnecessary and somewhat dangerous procedure.
a more clean penis? what the fuck. Thats bullshit, maybe if you are living in the middle ages but we all bathe reguarly now. There is zero difference in cleanlyness between circumcised and normal unless ofcourse you go months without washing[ in which case having a small area of your penis slightly cleaner does not make up for the fact that you stink like shit]HotShot said:and yet a lot of ppl do it.
Firstly its better to get circumcision when you are young - basically the reason it heals a lot quicker. babies have a rapid growth rate - their brains, muscles, bones etc develop really fast and wounds, cuts quickly heal compared to say a matured man. so a circumcision is best done when you are baby.
secondly, there is enough evidence to suggest that circumcision results in more clean penis. its easier to clean and maintain.
u could say circumcision is similar to cutting your nails - nails grow natural process but its important to cut them to prevent any infections to others and urself as well as for maintenance purposes.
u could also claim that cutting ur nails is a dangerous procedure - lol everything is dangerous.
what happens when you type in cricinfo wrong? go here : cricinfo