yeyjasminetime
Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 68
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2014
2sec^2 (x) -1=0
apparently x= 3pi /2
?????how?????
ty
apparently x= 3pi /2
?????how?????
ty
Why? I don't understand why "this can happen only when..."Well that makes a world of difference. In this case you are looking for values of x that will satisfy: sec x(2sec^2 x -1) < 0.
Since 2sec^2 x - 1 is always > 0, the only way this inequality can happen is when sec x itself is negative, and subject to the range 0 < x < 2 pi, this can happen only when pi/2 < x < 3pi/2, the required answer.
No. By re-processing the question, you have presented something confusing or misleading. It is dangerous presenting a half-digested question as you can see in this caseI thought i interpreted it correctly though?
secx=0 has no solution. (If you look at the graph of secx it is always greater or equal to one or less than or equal to -1, in other words secx cannot take any values between -1 and 1, so it cannot be zero).Okay, can I tell you what I did and you tell me where I went wrong?
So to solve b) I wanted to find the stationary points, because I can test around the stationary points to find where y is decreasing.
To do this I need to solve secx (2sec^2 x -1)=0 right?
I then solved (sec x) = 0 first and then (2 sec^2 x -1) = 0
For (sec x) = 0 , I got pi/2 and since that was right I tried to solve (2 sec^2 x -1) = 0 and that's where I got stuck.