This proof derives the required identity from scratch, rather than just substituting in things into LHS, and manipulating it to make it become RHS.
This could just be me, but I don't feel right 'proving' an identity by doing this, since this means that you must have known the identity in the first place! I would much rather start from something known, then work my way up. I've attached it below. I cbb using latex right now, so I'll just use my trusty tablet.
I used the fact that z1^2 + z2^2 = z1z2 SORTA looks like the binomial expansion (z1+z2)^2 = z1^2 + 2z1z2 + z2^2........... as a starting point.
Remember to keep an eye out for little clues like these. Use the terms of the question as a clue as to what to do.